1998
DOI: 10.1137/s0036144597321156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Methods of Least-Squares Type

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the application of least-squares variational principles to the numerical solution of partial differential equations. Our main focus is on the development of least-squares finite element methods for elliptic boundary value problems arising in fields such as fluid flows, linear elasticity, and convection-diffusion. For many of these problems, least-squares principles offer numerous theoretical and computational advantages in the algorithmic design and implementation of corresponding finite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
237
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
4
237
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate viscoelastic flow problems, it is convenient to split the extra-stress tensor into viscous and elastic parts by changing of variables in the LS formulations [1], [2]. The LS functional has been reported to offer several theoretical and computational advantages [3], and also provides a local and inexpensive a posteriori error estimator that may be used to guide adaptive refinement [4] and is perfectly effective and reliable for error control [5]. Therefore, difficulties in solving non-Newtonian flow problems include computational limitations and singularities caused by the high number of unknowns and geometric discontinuities, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate viscoelastic flow problems, it is convenient to split the extra-stress tensor into viscous and elastic parts by changing of variables in the LS formulations [1], [2]. The LS functional has been reported to offer several theoretical and computational advantages [3], and also provides a local and inexpensive a posteriori error estimator that may be used to guide adaptive refinement [4] and is perfectly effective and reliable for error control [5]. Therefore, difficulties in solving non-Newtonian flow problems include computational limitations and singularities caused by the high number of unknowns and geometric discontinuities, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such alternative methods include the diffuse element or element-free Galerkin methods [9,10], least-squares FEM [11], generalized or meshless finite different methods [12,13,14,15,16], generalized or extended FEM [17,18], and partition-of-unity FEM [19]. To reduce the dependency on mesh quality, these methods avoid the use of the piecewise-polynomial Lagrange basis functions found in the classical FEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a use of finite element method, the least-squares approach was widely studied in [1,2,4,5,6,13,14,19,24] and a least-squares method using pseudo spectral approximation were studied in [16,17,18,25]. The least-squares methods have several benefits such that the resulting algebraic system is always symmetric positive definite and the methods can avoid LBB compatibility condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%