1977
DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1977.18880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-element methods in semiconductor device simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting (14) into (13), noticing that and ignoring the term 0(h)|supp(∆θ i j)| we finally obtain:…”
Section: Theorem 3 Suppose That the Quadrilateral (Hexa Hedral) Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Substituting (14) into (13), noticing that and ignoring the term 0(h)|supp(∆θ i j)| we finally obtain:…”
Section: Theorem 3 Suppose That the Quadrilateral (Hexa Hedral) Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A practical scheme should be such that the computed terminal currents are conservative. Some authors 14,15 have discussed the evaluation of the terminal currents for their schemes. In the following we do this for our scheme.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Terminal Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The finite element (FE) method offers distinct advantages in TCAD simulations [2], since it allows the often inherently complex geometries and features of semiconductor devices to be captured where finite difference methods would require unreasonably fine grids. But, in present implementations, severe restrictions are placed on the shape of elements making mesh generation a burdensome task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%