2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4655(00)00212-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-element methods in electronic-structure theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite-difference method has also been used with the conjugate-gradient solver (Seitsonen, Puska, and Nieminen, 1995) and the Rayleigh quotient multigrid method (Heiskanen et al, 2001); see Torsti et al (2003Torsti et al ( , 2006. Pask et al (1999Pask et al ( , 2001) and Sterne, Pask, and Klein (1999) used finite-element modeling for electron-positron systems.…”
Section: F Numerical Approaches For Self-consistent Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite-difference method has also been used with the conjugate-gradient solver (Seitsonen, Puska, and Nieminen, 1995) and the Rayleigh quotient multigrid method (Heiskanen et al, 2001); see Torsti et al (2003Torsti et al ( , 2006. Pask et al (1999Pask et al ( , 2001) and Sterne, Pask, and Klein (1999) used finite-element modeling for electron-positron systems.…”
Section: F Numerical Approaches For Self-consistent Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we focus on the analysis of the NOR, SHG and THG, in our work the parameter λ is taken to be 4. The four lowest electron states in electric field-tunable Morse quantum well have been calculated numerically via finite element method [37,38]. In order to calculate the coefficients of NOR, SHG and THG, one considers that the system is irradiated by a light field with frequency ω applied with polarization along the growth direction of the quantum well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several techniques for band structure calculations for classical continuous systems such as photonic and phononic crystals. These include the plane-wave method (Ho et al 1990;Leung & Liu 1990;Zhang & Satpathy 1990;Meade et al 1993;Johnson & Joannopoulos 2001), the transfer matrix method (Pendry & MacKinnon 1992), the multiple scattering method (Leung & Qiu 1993;Wang et al 1993), the finite-difference time-domain method (Chan et al 1995), the finite-difference method (Yang 1996), the finite-element (FE) method (Axmann & Kuchment 1999;Dobson 1999;Pask et al 2001), the meshless method (Jun et al 2003), the multiple multipole method (Moreno et al 2002), the wavelet method (Checoury & Lourtioz 2006;Yan & Wang 2006) and the pseudospectral method (Chiang et al 2007), among others (Botten et al 2001;Marrone et al 2002;Yuan & Lu 2006) (see Busch et al (2007) for a review). Some of the methods involve expanding the periodic domain (or potential) and the wave field using a truncated basis.…”
Section: (A) Classical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%