2018
DOI: 10.3390/ma11112073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Element-Mesh Based Method for Modeling and Optimization of Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing

Abstract: A parameterization modeling method based on finite element mesh to create complex large-scale lattice structures for AM is presented, and a corresponding approach for size optimization of lattice structures is also developed. In the modeling method, meshing technique is employed to obtain the meshes and nodes of lattice structures for a given geometry. Then, a parametric description of lattice unit cells based on the element type, element nodes and their connecting relationships is developed. Once the unit cel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as each bar has a different section as a consequence of the different stress values calculated, the lattice structure cannot be considered as uniform along the piece. Thus, those approaches that estimate the mechanical behavior of cellular structures through the testing of specimens out of the standards and that contain a certain number of unit cells would not be of application in this particular case, as in the works of Chen et al [19], who developed a finite element mesh based method for optimization of lattice structures for AM; Hussein [20], who studied the development of lightweight cellular structures for additive manufacturing with metal; Mahmoud and Elbestawi [21], where lattice structures were fabricated by additive manufacturing in orthopedic implants; Maliaris and Sarafis [22], where lattice structures were modelled using a generative algorithm; Panda [23] and Weeger et al [24], who worked in the design and development of cellular structures for AM; or Vannutelli [25], where the mechanical behavior of lattice structures was analyzed. As Figure 1 exposes, a solid layer by layer configuration represents the most consistent As exposed before, from the point of view of the applicability of the mentioned standards, only a continuous material could be characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as each bar has a different section as a consequence of the different stress values calculated, the lattice structure cannot be considered as uniform along the piece. Thus, those approaches that estimate the mechanical behavior of cellular structures through the testing of specimens out of the standards and that contain a certain number of unit cells would not be of application in this particular case, as in the works of Chen et al [19], who developed a finite element mesh based method for optimization of lattice structures for AM; Hussein [20], who studied the development of lightweight cellular structures for additive manufacturing with metal; Mahmoud and Elbestawi [21], where lattice structures were fabricated by additive manufacturing in orthopedic implants; Maliaris and Sarafis [22], where lattice structures were modelled using a generative algorithm; Panda [23] and Weeger et al [24], who worked in the design and development of cellular structures for AM; or Vannutelli [25], where the mechanical behavior of lattice structures was analyzed. As Figure 1 exposes, a solid layer by layer configuration represents the most consistent As exposed before, from the point of view of the applicability of the mentioned standards, only a continuous material could be characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of these works the analysis and the characterization of the tested parts combine the performance of mechanical tests in the laboratory and simulation work supported by the Finite Element Method (FEM). This approach allows to validate the results obtained in the simulations and characterize the mechanical behavior of the parts based on this type of structures [92], [95]- [98].…”
Section: Approaches Far From the Traditional Test Standardsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Usually, the works developed from these kind of approaches, carry out the corresponding mechanical tests considering either the unit cells or small structures obtained as a sum of a certain number of them, but without referring the study to any testing standards and without using the defined specimens in them. The works developed by Chen et al [92] and Hussein et al [93] illustrate the preparation of compression tests on cellular structures. In both cases, compression tests are carried out on the pieces considered without referring them to any testing standard and using own designed specimens, not standardized ones.…”
Section: Approaches Far From the Traditional Test Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are developed in previous works to determine the dimensional tolerance to be applied on the nominal diameter of each bar [ 28 ]. Moreover, a uniform repetition pattern is defined throughout the heel’s infill and a size optimization is done to each bar of the lattice structure [ 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%