2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element formulation of laminated beams with capability to model the thickness expansion

Abstract: This paper presents a static analysis of laminated beams by using a 6 degree-of-freedom hybrid type quasi-3D higher order shear deformation theory (HSDT). The governing equations are derived by employing the principle of virtual work and solved by means of Hermite-Lagrangian finite element method for laminated beams with several boundary conditions. A mixed interpolation, 1 C cubic Hermite and a 0 C linear Lagrange interpolation are used for the kinematic variables. Different types of shear strain shape functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For numerical methods, finite element method has been widely used to analyze composite beams [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. For analytical approach, Navier solution is the simplest one, which is only applicable for simply supported boundary conditions ( [18][19][20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For numerical methods, finite element method has been widely used to analyze composite beams [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. For analytical approach, Navier solution is the simplest one, which is only applicable for simply supported boundary conditions ( [18][19][20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the advantages of stiffness-to-weight's ratio and anisotropy material properties, laminated composite (LC) beams have recently attracted a number of researches with different models and approaches. Many beam models with various kinematics have been investigated to predict accurately their static, buckling and vibration behaviours such as layer-wise theories (LWT) [1,2], equivalent single-layer theories (ESLTs) [3][4][5][6][7], zigzag theories (ZZT) [8][9][10] and Carrera's unified formulation (CUF) [11,12] . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For numerical approaches, the finite element method is widely used for analysis of static and vibration of LC beams [6,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. For analytical methods, Navier procedure [3] is the simplest one for analysis of LC beams, however this approach is only suitable for simply-supported boundary conditions (BCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buckling occurs around P = 2.92×10 9 N, 6.48×10 9 N and 8.45×10 9 N for C-F, S-S and C-C beams, which correspond to zero natural frequency. DBT) ( [15,17]) and quasi-3D theories [24,36] in Table 7. A good agreement between the present results and those of previous studies can be seen.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%