2020
DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2019.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element-based model for crack propagation in linear elastic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The testing equipment and loading setup for conducting in‐plane fracture tests (i.e., modes I and II) are relatively simple and such tests can be done by the conventional testing machines and common fixtures such as tensile/compression and three or four‐point bend test setup. Accordingly, a number of test specimens including circular samples (Brazilian disc and flatten Brazilian disc under compression, 1–10 semi‐circular bend, 6,11–17 center crack ring under compression, 18–21 edge notch disc bend (ENDB), 22–26 and circular edge crack wedge loading 27 ), beam samples (three‐point long beam, 28–31 three‐point short beam, 32–36 and four‐point bend beam 37–44 ), and thin plate shape samples (compact tension shear, 45–47 square plate in tension, 48,49 and triangular plate in bending 50–52 ) are among the frequently used test specimens employed in the past for mode I and mixed I/II fracture testing of different brittle and quasi brittle materials such as rock, geo‐materials, concrete, polymers, ceramics, and etc. However, for introducing out‐of‐plane or mode III deformation in a cracked specimen via a straightforward and direct manner, it is usually necessary to apply torsional‐type loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing equipment and loading setup for conducting in‐plane fracture tests (i.e., modes I and II) are relatively simple and such tests can be done by the conventional testing machines and common fixtures such as tensile/compression and three or four‐point bend test setup. Accordingly, a number of test specimens including circular samples (Brazilian disc and flatten Brazilian disc under compression, 1–10 semi‐circular bend, 6,11–17 center crack ring under compression, 18–21 edge notch disc bend (ENDB), 22–26 and circular edge crack wedge loading 27 ), beam samples (three‐point long beam, 28–31 three‐point short beam, 32–36 and four‐point bend beam 37–44 ), and thin plate shape samples (compact tension shear, 45–47 square plate in tension, 48,49 and triangular plate in bending 50–52 ) are among the frequently used test specimens employed in the past for mode I and mixed I/II fracture testing of different brittle and quasi brittle materials such as rock, geo‐materials, concrete, polymers, ceramics, and etc. However, for introducing out‐of‐plane or mode III deformation in a cracked specimen via a straightforward and direct manner, it is usually necessary to apply torsional‐type loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x j , y j (13) where N n is the number of nodes linked to node i. The mesh smoothing process consists of several iterations.…”
Section: Adaptive Mesh Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits sought here are both faster execution time and the ability to process larger problems. In order to simulate 2D cracks under mixed mode loading, the current developed software code is formulated to allow the researcher to estimate the fatigue life and crack trajectory using the automated adaptive mesh finite element [11][12][13][14][15]. This software was created in 2004 and continues to include several features for the simulation of two-dimensional fatigue crack growth under LEFM assumptions [12,[16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complicated geometries require a high-density mesh and a complex element in the simulation method. Other researchers developed their own two-dimensional source code program to determine and analyse the fatigue crack growth and crack propagation under the condition, namely, static loading and also the determination of stress intensity factor using the mesh strategy [9][10][11][12]. It is difficult to opt a method for accurate calculation with minimal time and at low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%