2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element–Based Machine-Learning Approach to Detect Damage in Bridges under Operational and Environmental Variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Rather, a coupled approach of model-driven and datadriven algorithms can work together to achieve a reasonable damage identification level. 19…”
Section: Damage Definition and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 Rather, a coupled approach of model-driven and datadriven algorithms can work together to achieve a reasonable damage identification level. 19…”
Section: Damage Definition and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers investigated these nonstationary sources of variations. Several works 15,19,[72][73][74] have shown that the dynamic performance of bridges varies significantly depending on the condition that the bridge is subjected to daily. The effect of these trends on damage-sensitive features could be removed by utilizing different linear and nonlinear correction models.…”
Section: Data Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the process of finite element model updating is inherently highly uncertain (Simoen, De Roeck, & Lombaert, 2015). These uncertainties are not only caused by signal measurement errors and modeling errors but also by the variability in operational and environmental conditions (Figueiredo, Moldovan, Santos, Campos, & Costa, 2019; Sohn, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang et al and Kiani et al implemented certain algorithms such as the k-nearest neighbor, simple Bayes, random forest, and decision tree to analyze and predict the seismic response, and it was concluded that the dataset is the key to the learning performance, and accuracy of the classification models was better than those of the regression models in seismic response prediction [23,24]. Figueiredo et al explored a hybrid approach for damage detection with machine learning techniques [25]. Wang et al and Alwanas et al proposed a methodology which employs the machine learning methods to establish the constitutive models of structural member by using the test data [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%