2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4940499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis simulations for ultrasonic array NDE inspections

Abstract: Abstract. Advances in manufacturing techniques and materials have led to an increase in the demand for reliable and robust inspection techniques to maintain safety critical features. The application of modelling methods to develop and evaluate inspections is becoming an essential tool for the NDE community. Current analytical methods are inadequate for simulation of arbitrary components and heterogeneous materials, such as anisotropic welds or composite structures. Finite element analysis software (FEA), such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-two sources were placed on the top boundary of the domain and a pressure wave (with centre frequency 1.5 MHz) was sent into the material from each source in turn. The average time-variant, normal stress was then measured at 32 points along the bottom edge of the domain to simulate our receiving array [33]. These received waveforms were processed to extract the first times of arrival of the wave front (measured as the time at which the receiver is first subjected to a stress greater than 10 −6 Pa).…”
Section: The Anisotropic Multi-stencil Fast Marching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thirty-two sources were placed on the top boundary of the domain and a pressure wave (with centre frequency 1.5 MHz) was sent into the material from each source in turn. The average time-variant, normal stress was then measured at 32 points along the bottom edge of the domain to simulate our receiving array [33]. These received waveforms were processed to extract the first times of arrival of the wave front (measured as the time at which the receiver is first subjected to a stress greater than 10 −6 Pa).…”
Section: The Anisotropic Multi-stencil Fast Marching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, given the incident wave angle, the speed that the wave travels through that cell can be calculated from where the wave vector bisects the rotated slowness curve. The longitudinal group slowness curve (the reciprocal of the group velocity) for a transversely isotropic cubic austenitic weld is obtained by solving the Christoffel equation [12] with a cubic stiffness tensor where c 11 = 203.6GPa, c 12 = 133.5GPa and c 44 = 129.8GPa and the density is ρ = 7874kg/m 3 (these are taken from the weld properties used in [32,33]). Note that the method is not restricted to the examination of cubic materials and a straightforward extension could be realized to consider hexagonal materials.…”
Section: Materials Parametrization By Voronoi Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finite element analysis (FEA) has been described as the best way to obtain quantitative data for an acoustic array design [ 52 ]. Its reliability to evaluate the integrity of theoretical designs in academic and commercial applications has been emphasized [ 57 , 58 ]. Consequently, a commercial FEA software, Pzflex ® (version 1.21.7.0), is employed to validate the design as well as evaluate the TVR level of the conformal array with respect to the target minimum of 147 dB.…”
Section: Validation Of the Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a fair representation of the physical scenario as ultrasonic trandsucers are usually placed in a single plane so that we effectively inspect a slice of the component. However, it can be noted that PZFlex has the capability to read in computer aided design (CAD) files of 3D components [7] and so the framework developed can easily be extended to more complex inspection scenarios in the future if necessary.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Ultrasonic Inspection Of A Given Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%