2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of the hyper-elastic contact problem in automotive door sealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical Stress-strain behavior of PDMS is shown in figure 2. Also shown in figure 2 is the Non-Linear-Hyper-Elastic material model with 9th order Mooney-Rivlin approximation [9,11,12,13], which was used to approximate the behavior of the PDMS in our FE model [5].…”
Section: Hyper Elastic Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical Stress-strain behavior of PDMS is shown in figure 2. Also shown in figure 2 is the Non-Linear-Hyper-Elastic material model with 9th order Mooney-Rivlin approximation [9,11,12,13], which was used to approximate the behavior of the PDMS in our FE model [5].…”
Section: Hyper Elastic Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seal is compressed to fill the narrow gaps between the door and the body frame when the door is closed, thus insulating the cabin from water, dust, and sound. 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, it is necessary to mention the importance of the design and development processes of the closing force. These forces must be balanced to seal the door closing forces of the vehicle examined under the prism of static and dynamic clamping forces (Ordieres-Meré et al, 2008). Looking at the door-closing forces in the three variants of numerical simulations that have been analysed in this work (see Figure 16 where the force is represented against time and the displacement at fixed sections), it is easy to realise that the sealing pressure is sensitive to each of the cases studied, where the final forces vary between 10% and the 25%) in the analysed quasi-static case (i.e., avoiding additional dynamic forces arising from closing door speed and its mechanical acceleration).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%