2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of the dynamic response of clamped sandwich beams subject to shock loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qiu et al [2004;2005a] developed an analytical model for the deformation response of clamped circular sandwich plates subjected to shock loading in air and in water. This model was verified using finite elements in [Qiu et al 2003] and then used to define a systematic design procedure [Fleck and Deshpande 2004a]. Liang et al [2007] used an analytic model based on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation to evaluate the mechanical performance of different core topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qiu et al [2004;2005a] developed an analytical model for the deformation response of clamped circular sandwich plates subjected to shock loading in air and in water. This model was verified using finite elements in [Qiu et al 2003] and then used to define a systematic design procedure [Fleck and Deshpande 2004a]. Liang et al [2007] used an analytic model based on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation to evaluate the mechanical performance of different core topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These panels possess excellent properties such as lightweight, high specific stiffness, moisture independency, and corrosion resistance. In the past, several researchers studied blast response of the sandwich foam panels and presented the effectiveness of these panels under blast loading (Guruprasad and Mukherjee, 2000aand 2000b, Hanssen et al, 2002aand 2002b, Qiu et al, 2003, Xue and Hutchinson, 2003, Radford et al, 2006, Sriram et al, 2006, Nemat-Nasser et al, 2007, Bahei-El-Din and Dvorak, 2008, Tekalur et al, 2008, Karagiozova et al, 2009, Zhu et al, 2009, and Langdon et al, 2010. Recently, with the advancement in technology, metal foam has emerged as an important material in blast resistance applications due to their high energy absorption potential (Ashby et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the past research work has been carried out on the sandwich foam panels with different varieties of core ranging from fiber reinforced polymer (FRP), natural material (air, sand/soils), polymeric foams, honeycombs and commercially available metal foams (Hanssen et al, 2002aand 2002b, Qiu et al, 2003, Xue and Hutchinson, 2003, Radford et al, 2006, Sriram et al, 2006, NematNasser et al, 2007, Bahei-El-Din and Dvorak, 2008, Tekalur et al, 2008, Karagiozova et al, 2009, Zhu et al, 2009, Langdon et al, 2010, Jing et al, 2013, Chang et al, 2013, and Liu et al, 2013. No studies, however, have been reported on the stiffened sandwich foam panels and their blast response, except author's recent work on the response of stiffened polymer foam sandwich structures under impulsive loading (Goel et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have indicated the advantage of well-designed metal sandwich plates over solid plates under high intensity dynamic loading, where combinations of high strength and energy absorption are vital for the structural performance [Qiu et al 2003;Xue and Hutchinson 2004a;Fleck and Deshpande 2004;Rathbun et al 2006;. Metal sandwich plates encompass further advantages when the high intensity loading is transmitted through water, which can make them an excellent choice for ship protection [Xue and Hutchinson 2003;Liang et al 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%