2014
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Geometry and Design of Zirconia Crowns on Stress Distribution

Abstract: The modified design of the zirconia coping reduces the stress concentration at the interface with the veneer ceramic, and the simplified preparation can exert a stress distribution similar to that of the anatomical preparation at and near the load point, when load is applied to the center of the crown.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the influence on the stress level of this resilience was negligible for the abutment teeth of single restorations . Numerically, no difference between the cylindrical crown model and the anatomical crown model was observed for the maximum principal stress values , and only a slight difference was found at the level of the cement layer . However, the values observed here should not be directly compared with other non‐computational laboratory findings; rather, they should be compared with each other in the analysis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the influence on the stress level of this resilience was negligible for the abutment teeth of single restorations . Numerically, no difference between the cylindrical crown model and the anatomical crown model was observed for the maximum principal stress values , and only a slight difference was found at the level of the cement layer . However, the values observed here should not be directly compared with other non‐computational laboratory findings; rather, they should be compared with each other in the analysis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Numerically, no difference between the cylindrical crown model and the anatomical crown model was observed for the maximum principal stress values , and only a slight difference was found at the level of the cement layer . However, the values observed here should not be directly compared with other non‐computational laboratory findings; rather, they should be compared with each other in the analysis . The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different finish line designs and abutment materials on the stress distribution of bilayer and monolithic zirconia crowns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…and assisting in all experimental approaches, is the numeric approximation of the problem using finite element (FE) models [44,47,82,[99][100][101][102]. The major advantage of this tool is the simulation of dynamic thermal or mechanical processes as they happen during sintering or intraoral mastication [82,100].…”
Section: Measurement Of Residual Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and assisting in all experimental approaches, is the numeric approximation of the problem using finite element (FE) models [44,47,82,[99][100][101][102]. The major advantage of this tool is the simulation of dynamic thermal or mechanical processes as they happen during sintering or intraoral mastication [82,100]. Also unique to this method is its application to individual geometries, allowing for research findings on planar structures to be extrapolated to curved and thus more clinically realistic geometries [12,99,103,104].…”
Section: Measurement Of Residual Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor in avoiding technical failures includes a framework design adequate to support the veneering ceramic . Increasing the amount of zirconia in FPDs and improving the support of the veneering ceramic could improve the stress distribution internally . In order to avoid failure, clinical applications need framework designs that will prevent stress from concentrating at of the zirconia‐veneering ceramic interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%