AIP Conference Proceedings 2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3155125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Minimum Plastic Zone Radius criterion for crack initiation direction under mixed mode loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also clear from Fig.4 that, for a particular applied load, K eff in mode-I (s/W=1.6) is more than that of mode-II (s/W=0). The nature of variation of K eff vs. s/W (Fig.4) is in similar manner with the earlier reported results (Benrahou et al, 2007, Sharanaprabhu andKudari, 2008) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also clear from Fig.4 that, for a particular applied load, K eff in mode-I (s/W=1.6) is more than that of mode-II (s/W=0). The nature of variation of K eff vs. s/W (Fig.4) is in similar manner with the earlier reported results (Benrahou et al, 2007, Sharanaprabhu andKudari, 2008) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…7. The nature of the plastic zones obtained in this analysis is in good agreement with the theoretical plastic zone shapes presented in (Benrahou et al, 2007, Sharanaprabhu andKudari, 2008). It is also seen from Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in contrast with the predictions of some LEFM-based theoretical criteria (such as the MTS criterion), fracture toughness in pure mode III can be larger than in pure mode I. A similar argument has been presented in previous studies about mixed mode I/II fracture, too, see for example (Kudari et al, 2007;Sharanaprabhu and Kudari, 2009). …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…There are several theories concerning crack initiation orientation under mixed-mode loadings [35][36][37][38][39], and they are mainly based on the singular elastic field, which may become inaccurate when the crack tip plasticity increases. Recently, methods for the determination of crack initiation angles based on the shape of the plastic zone have been developed, such as those of Golos and Wasiluk [40], Wasiluk and Golos [41], Kahn and Khraisheh [42], and Sharanaprabhu and Kudari [43]. The idea behind the Minimum Plastic Zone Radius (MPZR) criterion is that the crack initiates in the direction of the minimum distance between the crack tip and elastic-plastic boundary [40,41] or in the direction of the local or global minimum distance, depending on the loading condition [42].…”
Section: The Minimum Plastic Zone Radius (Mpzr) Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%