2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(01)00066-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of impact damage response of composite motorcycle safety helmets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with those from previous protective surfacing (8,10) and motorcycle helmet studies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) on head impacts. This difference is attributable to the dependence of HIC value on both the peak acceleration and the distribution of the acceleration-time trace, which make it more sensitive to variation than peak acceleration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is consistent with those from previous protective surfacing (8,10) and motorcycle helmet studies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) on head impacts. This difference is attributable to the dependence of HIC value on both the peak acceleration and the distribution of the acceleration-time trace, which make it more sensitive to variation than peak acceleration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A comparison, of compression tests on a complete shell with FEA of the same loading geometry, showed that the Young's modulus of the GRP in the Mavet helmet was relatively low. This is almost certainly true for other helmets, suggesting that the moduli used in [11] and [12] were probably too high. GRP fracture and delamination does not occur in the flat anvil impacts, so these phenomena were not modelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass fibre reinforced polyester resin (GRP) is used for many helmet shells, but its elastic properties depend on the processing conditions. Researchers often used GRP Young's moduli measured using flat test coupons, rather than values deduced from tests on helmet shells; Kostoupoulos et al [11] used an inplane Young's modulus of 19.7 GPa for a 2 mm thick prototype GRP shell. Aiello et al [12], who simulated direct impacts on a full-face Dainese helmet with a mixed-fibre composite shell, used an in-plane Young's modulus of 24 MPa at 50 °C.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study on the influence of mechanical characteristics of the brain tissue on head injury criteria using finite element analysis (FEA) shows that head impact criterion (HIC), a widely used head injury measure for dummies derived from the time history of an accelerometer mounted at the centre of gravity of a dummy's head, is insensitive to the type of material used to model the brain tissue [6], thus, in this sense, justifying the use of different models. Evaluations of head injuries using FEA have been performed in numerous studies [7][8][9], some of them using helmets too [10,11]. The main difference in this study is the use of more detailed models of helmet and head and a focus on the motorcycle crash-related impact conditions in order to model more realistic scenarios, as well as a different approach to analysing the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%