1995
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.52.2727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-element analysis of electrostatic interactions in electrorheological fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5͑a͒, The result, that the interaction in castor oil is stronger than that in silicone oil as the frequency changes from 100 Hz to 3 kHz, must be due to the higher dielectric constant m of the castor oil according to f ϳ m . 8,12,16 Here, the conductivity m of silicone oil and castor oil (ϳ10 Ϫ13 s m Ϫ1 ) are on the same quantitative scale while the dielectric constant of SrTiO 3 is much higher in the system, leading to the mismatch factor ␤ 2 →1 regardless of the variation of frequency. In order for the conductivity and the dielectric constant from high to low, there are methyl salicylate (ϭ6 ϫ10 Ϫ7 s/m), ethyl salicylate (ϭ1ϫ10 Ϫ7 s/m), ethyl benzoate (ϭ5ϫ10 Ϫ8 s/m), and silicone oil (ϳ10 Ϫ13 ) to be used as fluid media.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5͑a͒, The result, that the interaction in castor oil is stronger than that in silicone oil as the frequency changes from 100 Hz to 3 kHz, must be due to the higher dielectric constant m of the castor oil according to f ϳ m . 8,12,16 Here, the conductivity m of silicone oil and castor oil (ϳ10 Ϫ13 s m Ϫ1 ) are on the same quantitative scale while the dielectric constant of SrTiO 3 is much higher in the system, leading to the mismatch factor ␤ 2 →1 regardless of the variation of frequency. In order for the conductivity and the dielectric constant from high to low, there are methyl salicylate (ϭ6 ϫ10 Ϫ7 s/m), ethyl salicylate (ϭ1ϫ10 Ϫ7 s/m), ethyl benzoate (ϭ5ϫ10 Ϫ8 s/m), and silicone oil (ϳ10 Ϫ13 ) to be used as fluid media.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the contributions to the difference of each higher multipole can be either positive or negative. Subsequent studies were carried out based on the exact evaluation of the electrostatic energy by numerical methods such as the finite element method [31][32][33], the multipole expansion method [34], and the Bergman method [35][36][37]. These calculations gave consistent results and all concluded that the ground state of the DER fluid is a BCT structure.…”
Section: ð3:45þmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The high yield stress and its near-linear dependence on the electric field indicate that the behaviors of our STP ER fluid can be explained by the model of the polar molecule dominated ER (PM-ER) effect [15]. The PM-ER effect is based on the interaction of the polar molecule polarization charge between the particles, where the local electric field is much higher than that of the external field [16][17][18][19], and results in the polar molecules aligning in the direction of the electric field. Figure 3 shows the shear stress of STP ER fluid as a function of shear rate under various electric fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%