2020
DOI: 10.3390/math8071113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Custom Shoulder Implants Provides Accurate Prediction of Initial Stability

Abstract: Custom reverse shoulder implants represent a valuable solution for patients with large bone defects. Since each implant has unique patient-specific features, finite element (FE) analysis has the potential to guide the design process by virtually comparing the stability of multiple configurations without the need of a mechanical test. The aim of this study was to develop an automated virtual bench test to evaluate the initial stability of custom shoulder implants during the design phase, by simulating a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whiteside's line being a smaller landmark leads to rotational error of up to 10 • , even for small uncertainties [21]. It is a well-known fact that alignment error >3 • from the natural alignment of the knee leads to quick wear and discomfort of the patient, and finite element analysis can accurately predict initial stability of an implant; however, the computational cost increases [15,22,23]. The sTEA, being an inconsistent landmark [24], leaves only aTEA to be a reliable choice for assigning the FCS and setting the rotational alignment of the implant [19,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whiteside's line being a smaller landmark leads to rotational error of up to 10 • , even for small uncertainties [21]. It is a well-known fact that alignment error >3 • from the natural alignment of the knee leads to quick wear and discomfort of the patient, and finite element analysis can accurately predict initial stability of an implant; however, the computational cost increases [15,22,23]. The sTEA, being an inconsistent landmark [24], leaves only aTEA to be a reliable choice for assigning the FCS and setting the rotational alignment of the implant [19,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%