1994
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis Of An Axially Moving Beam, Part II: Stability Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, after q i (t) and r i (t) are solved, Eq. (53) can be recast as [15,16] and Theodore et al [19]. During the beam extension in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Dynamic Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, after q i (t) and r i (t) are solved, Eq. (53) can be recast as [15,16] and Theodore et al [19]. During the beam extension in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Dynamic Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu and Ni [14] presented the linear dynamics of a cantilever beam with an arbitrarily varying length where the tension from their axially moving acceleration was incorporated; they also studied the dynamic stability from the energy viewpoint. Base on the finite element method, Stylianou and Tabarrok [15,16] investigated the axially moving slender beam; their numerical results specified that the beam would be stabilized in extension and unstabilized in retraction. The dynamics and control of a translating flexible beam with a tip mass at one end emerging from or retracting into a rigid base was proposed by Tadikonda and Baruh [17]; they exploited the eigenfunctions of a cantilever beam to obtain closed-form expressions for several domain integrals that arise in the model, which showed that the coupling effect of elastic and translational motions is very important to the beam control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marynowski and Kapitaniak [14] investigated the nonlinear dynamics of an axially moving viscoelastic beam by introducing a three-parameter Zener internal damping in the beam model; they used the Galerkin scheme along with Runge-Kutta method to solve the equations numerically. A finite element approach was used by Stylianou and Tabarrok [15], who analyzed the stability of an axially moving beam. Chakraborty and Mallik [16] examined the stability of an axially moving beam analytically by means of the method of multiple scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stylianou and Tabarrok [12,13] used finite element formulation to consider translational and rotary inertia effects of the tip mass and made a stability analysis. Borglund [14] considered the stability and optimal design of a beam subject to forces induced by fluid flow through attached pipes with a tip mass by using finite element formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%