2020
DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis2030019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of a New Dental Implant Design Optimized for the Desirable Stress Distribution in the Surrounding Bone Region

Abstract: Dental implant macro- and micro-shape should be designed to maximize the delivery of optimal favorable stresses in the surrounding bone region. The present study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution in cortical and cancellous bone surrounding two models of dental implants with the same diameter and length (4.0 × 11 mm) and different implant/neck design and thread patterns. Sample A was a standard cylindric implant with cylindric neck and V-shaped threads, and sample B was a new conical implant with revers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported the relationship between the implant geometry and force distribution in a static condition [2,19,21,22]. There is a need to evaluate the force distribution within the surrounding bone during the dynamic insertion of the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported the relationship between the implant geometry and force distribution in a static condition [2,19,21,22]. There is a need to evaluate the force distribution within the surrounding bone during the dynamic insertion of the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone healing of this type was also reproduced in the current study, where implants A, E, and G resulted in the initiation of mature bones from the root of the healing chambers in the early stage (Day 4) of bone healing, as shown in Figure 1a,e,g. Moreover, several simulation studies have focused on the biomechanical stimulus of bones, in order to eliminating stress concentration and reducing bone resorption around implants [24][25][26][27]. However, uniform material properties of bones around the implants were typically assumed; cell differentiation and fluid stimulus was also ignored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study showed that an increase in the implant diameter, rather than an increase in its length had more contribution to a reduction in the maximum Von Mises equivalent stress around the implant neck [10]. Also, the shape of implant neck and its threat pattern can change the stress distribution in cortical and cancellous bones [11]. Moreover, alongside dimensional parameters, materials utilized for construction of prosthetics have significant effects on stress distribution and stress concentration in bones [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%