2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2016.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite dimensional Hopf actions on Weyl algebras

Abstract: We prove that any action of a finite dimensional Hopf algebra H on a Weyl algebra A over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero factors through a group action. In other words, Weyl algebras do not admit genuine finite quantum symmetries. This improves a previous result by the authors, where the statement was established for semisimple H. The proof relies on a refinement of the method previously used: namely, considering reductions of the action of H on A modulo prime powers rather than primes. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, note that if a ∈ D p m is central modulo p m−1 for some m ≥ 2, then a p is central. Hence Z(m) ⊃ Z(m − 1) p , implying that Z(m) ⊃ Z p m−1 and therefore [Z : Z(m)] is finite (by Lemma 3.4) and is a power of p. Now the proof proceeds by invoking Theorem 3.2, whose assumptions are satisfied by the nondegeneracy property of B and using a straightforward generalization of [CEW2,Lemma 4.6].…”
Section: Hopf Actions On Nondegenerate Quantizations Now Let Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, note that if a ∈ D p m is central modulo p m−1 for some m ≥ 2, then a p is central. Hence Z(m) ⊃ Z(m − 1) p , implying that Z(m) ⊃ Z p m−1 and therefore [Z : Z(m)] is finite (by Lemma 3.4) and is a power of p. Now the proof proceeds by invoking Theorem 3.2, whose assumptions are satisfied by the nondegeneracy property of B and using a straightforward generalization of [CEW2,Lemma 4.6].…”
Section: Hopf Actions On Nondegenerate Quantizations Now Let Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another generalization of Theorem 2.4 concerns nondegenerate quantizations, defined in Definition 1.6. To obtain it, we will first need to generalize [CEW2,Theorem 3.2]. Let H be a finite dimensional Hopf algebra over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic p > 0, and let Z be a finitely generated field extension of F .…”
Section: Finite Dimensional Hopf Actions On Filtered Quantizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations