1992
DOI: 10.1109/8.138836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-difference time-domain modeling of curved surfaces (EM scattering)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
124
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
124
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The conformal FDTD method on non-orthogonal grids [15][16][17], counter path FDTD method [18,19], and subgridding method [20][21][22] can represent curved interfaces suitably, but they are relatively difficult to implement and increase the memory and computation time. A different approach using effective permittivities (EPs), which derives from interface interpolations based on Ampere's and Faraday's integration laws, can reduce the error of the permittivity model on coarse grids in a simple implementation and at low computational cost [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformal FDTD method on non-orthogonal grids [15][16][17], counter path FDTD method [18,19], and subgridding method [20][21][22] can represent curved interfaces suitably, but they are relatively difficult to implement and increase the memory and computation time. A different approach using effective permittivities (EPs), which derives from interface interpolations based on Ampere's and Faraday's integration laws, can reduce the error of the permittivity model on coarse grids in a simple implementation and at low computational cost [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For broadband applications and problems including material interface, wave scattering and penetration over large and complex domains, the grid size required by using the FDTD method could become prohibitively expensive for modern computers. Much progress has been made in the past two decades in improving the FDTD method, including plentiful methods for removing the staircased approximation for boundaries and geometries, [5][6][7][8][9] and numerous high-order FDTD methods [3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Here, by high order we refer to orders being higher than three, which are essential for modern problems of moderately high frequency (short) waves and/or large domain in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalization of this approach assuming local curvilinear coordinates for cell faces was achieved by Lee et al [8]. In this respect, a number of alternate FDTD methods have also been proposed, such as the contour path FDTD [9], discrete surface integral FDTD [10], and nonorthogonal FDTD [11], in generalized curvilinear coordinates by using conformal meshes instead of staircasing for curved surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%