2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2017.2753220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Difference Solution of the Parabolic Equation Under Horizontal Polar Coordinates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the bonus of the development of computational electromagnetics, numerical methods can be used to calculate the RCS of the follow-up release experiments, especially for those with more complex shapes than the spherical clouds generated by point-source release. Among methods of computational electromagnetics, the parabolic equation (PE) method [11,12] proposed by Leontovich and Fock in 1940s, is an excellent one. It studies the energy propagation in a cone region along a given axis under an approximate wave equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the bonus of the development of computational electromagnetics, numerical methods can be used to calculate the RCS of the follow-up release experiments, especially for those with more complex shapes than the spherical clouds generated by point-source release. Among methods of computational electromagnetics, the parabolic equation (PE) method [11,12] proposed by Leontovich and Fock in 1940s, is an excellent one. It studies the energy propagation in a cone region along a given axis under an approximate wave equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the limitation of propagation angle, the calculation area is bound in a long and narrow rectangular area, so it is difficult to solve the problem of radio wave propagation in a large angle area quickly. For this reason, the cylindrical coordinate parabolic equation (CPE) method was proposed, which broke the limit of propagation angle in azimuth [3, 4]. Although its calculation angle can reach 360, it is not widely used because of the limitation that the calculation amount increases sharply with the increase of propagation distance [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In polar coordinates, the symmetric problem can be described more concisely. A finite difference method was proposed to solve the parabolic equation in polar coordinates in [10]. Britt et al [11] constructed a high-order compact difference scheme for the Helmholtz equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%