2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10092-013-0103-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite difference method for a fractional porous medium equation

Abstract: We formulate a numerical method to solve the porous medium type equation with fractional diffusion ∂u ∂t, and nonnegative initial data u(x, 0). We prove existence and uniqueness of the solution of the numerical method and also the convergence to the theoretical solution of the equation with an order depending on σ. We also propose a two points approximation to a σ-derivative with order O(h 2−σ ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the cited reference [6] some Barenblatt profiles as in Vázquez [16] are expected. In Figure 2…”
Section: Example 1: Barenblatt Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the cited reference [6] some Barenblatt profiles as in Vázquez [16] are expected. In Figure 2…”
Section: Example 1: Barenblatt Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see [6,20]). The errors of the numerical method are shown in Table 1 for times t = 3, 5 and 10 s. In order to obtain a general idea of the performance of the scheme, in [6] the author obtained an error of order 4.329 × 10 −4 in our second example.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this process, one must be aware of two fundamental points: first, it does not calculate exact solutions but approximate ones; second, it discretizes the problem by representing functions by a finite number of values, that is, to move from the “continuous” to the “discrete”. There are numerous methods for the numerical approximation of PDEs, among them, popularly adopted are finite element method (Lewis and Garner, 1972; Strada and Lewis, 1980; Morgan et al , 1984; Tadayon et al ,1987; Ahmed et al , 2011; Ahmed et al , 2009; Badruddin et al , 2006a, 2006b, 2007a, 2007b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c; Li and Rui, 2015; Sajid et al , 2008; Balla and Kishan, 2015; Wansophark et al , 2005) finite difference method (Achemlal and Sriti, 2015; del Teso, 2014; Oka et al , 1994; Rui and Liu, 2015; Liu and Yuan, 2008; Sheremet and Pop, 2014; Chamkha and Muneer, 2013; Sheremet, 2015) and finite volume method (Dotlić, 2014; Kumar, 2012). These finite element, finite difference and finite volume methods require that each PDE be converted into its equivalent set of algebraic equations that depends on the number of elements into which the physical domain is divided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%