2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite difference approach for consolidation with variable compressibility and permeability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the standard finite element method (FEM) [4,5] and the finite difference method (FDM) [6], newly developed numerical methods have been continuously used for the FCHM model of porous media, such as the mesh-free method [7], element-free Galerkin method [8], finite volume method [9] and numerical manifold method [10]. Additionally, new FEMs have been developed to overcome the pressure oscillations in lowpermeable and low-compressible porous media, such as the generalized conforming element [11], enhanced strain element [12], mixed finite element [13][14][15] and stabilized element [16].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the standard finite element method (FEM) [4,5] and the finite difference method (FDM) [6], newly developed numerical methods have been continuously used for the FCHM model of porous media, such as the mesh-free method [7], element-free Galerkin method [8], finite volume method [9] and numerical manifold method [10]. Additionally, new FEMs have been developed to overcome the pressure oscillations in lowpermeable and low-compressible porous media, such as the generalized conforming element [11], enhanced strain element [12], mixed finite element [13][14][15] and stabilized element [16].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of different numerical and analytical solutions for the non-linear consolidation equation where a variable c v is considered have been proposed (Gibson et al, 1967;Mesri & Choi, 1985;Morris, 2002;Lekha et al, 2003;Zhuang et al, 2005;Abbasi et al, 2007), these solutions are not popular in geotechnical engineering practice for the following reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the explicitness of the scheme is preserved while improving the stability of the scheme. Because of this merit, the ADE scheme has been popular for solving various engineering problems such as heat transfer and fluid diffusion problems, [3][4][5] advection-and convection-diffusion problems, [6][7][8][9] flow calculations in petroleum and natural gas reservoirs, 10,11 and even option pricing in engineering finance. 12 It should be noted that the implicit version of the ADE called the alternating direction implicit also exists and has been used to solve flow equation in reservoir engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%