2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-021-03138-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite control volume and scalability effects in velocimetry for application to aeroacoustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue is especially relevant to multi-point, planar measurement techniques such as particle image velocimetry (PIV), where the pixel resolution and working distance of the camera and lens hardware prescribe the minimum and maximum extents of the size of resolved turbulence features. An attenuation of turbulence statistics due to coarse instrument resolution has been observed in many experimental studies, not just in PIV [1][2][3][4]. However, comparisons of data measured via PIV and single-point measurement techniques such as hot-wire anemometry (HWA) have shown that PIV requires a much stricter tolerance of resolution to match that equivalent in single-point measurement techniques, in part due to the finite-volume averaging done within the interrogation windows of the PIV images [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This issue is especially relevant to multi-point, planar measurement techniques such as particle image velocimetry (PIV), where the pixel resolution and working distance of the camera and lens hardware prescribe the minimum and maximum extents of the size of resolved turbulence features. An attenuation of turbulence statistics due to coarse instrument resolution has been observed in many experimental studies, not just in PIV [1][2][3][4]. However, comparisons of data measured via PIV and single-point measurement techniques such as hot-wire anemometry (HWA) have shown that PIV requires a much stricter tolerance of resolution to match that equivalent in single-point measurement techniques, in part due to the finite-volume averaging done within the interrogation windows of the PIV images [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamba & Clemens (2011) determined that, without an anti-aliasing filter, the spatial averaging inherent of the PIV algorithm results in a rapid decrease of the energy spectrum, where the effects are more prominent in the higher wavenumber limits of the resolved spectrum [6]. The effect of control-volume size in measurements made with Doppler global velocimetry (DGV) (akin to the interrogation window size in PIV) by Saltzmann et al (2021) showed similar attenuation in the higher wavenumber portion of their spectra, but concluded that the impact to the larger scales was minimal and mostly depended on inherent measurement uncertainties [2]. Several studies have offered insight into correction methods, typically using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), usually in the form of direct numerical simulations (DNS), for a priori estimates of the flow behavior ( [7][8][9][10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%