2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite circular fin method for heat and mass transfer characteristics for plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers under fully and partially wet surface conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditions were selected such that condensation occurred on the entire fin surface. So partial condensation on fins is not included [5,10,25]. The numerical analyses of the fully wetted fins indicate that the heat transfer fin efficiency for wetted fins is similar to that for dry fins, as shown by comparison of Figures 4 and 8.…”
Section: Fully Wetted Fin Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conditions were selected such that condensation occurred on the entire fin surface. So partial condensation on fins is not included [5,10,25]. The numerical analyses of the fully wetted fins indicate that the heat transfer fin efficiency for wetted fins is similar to that for dry fins, as shown by comparison of Figures 4 and 8.…”
Section: Fully Wetted Fin Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…An equivalent convection heat transfer term for fully wet conditions was added to impact the heat transfer, owing to the condensation latent heat. There have been few analyses of the fin efficiency for fully wet conditions, though there have been many studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] turning to the fin efficiency values. Some design manuals [12] and many experimental studies [24] have used the Schmidt model for dry conditions and the McQuiston model [12,13] for fully wet conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the RH ai is about 100%, the Lewis number (Le) decreases as the Reynolds number (Re Dc ) increases. Figure 4a shows the plots of predicted Lewis number (Le) and experimental data by using the correlations of Pirompugd et al (2007;. The correlations gives larger error of Lewis number (Le) ranging from -52 to 23%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the previous studies [14]- [16], it is understood that n t has insignificant effects on both air and refrigerant side heat transfer coefficients and therefore it is assumed to be ignorable. Furthermore, we assume the overall heat transfer coefficient U o is regarded being unrelated to n t , and the friction factor, f, is regard being invariable with n t according to Ref.…”
Section: Determination the Optimal Tube Row Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%