2001
DOI: 10.1017/s002211200000327x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-amplitude convection in the presence of finitely conducting boundaries

Abstract: Finite-amplitude convection in the form of rolls and their stability with respect to infinitesimal disturbances is investigated in the case of boundaries of the horizontal fluid layer which exhibit a thermal conductivity comparable to that of the fluid. It is found that even when rolls represent the preferred mode at the onset of convection a transition to square cells may occur at slightly supercritical Rayleigh numbers. The phenomenon of inertial convection in low Prandtl number fluids appears to becom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The balloons are shifted towards smaller wavenumbers with decreased conductivity of the slabs. As was found for cases of infinitely thick slabs by Westerburg & Busse (2001), the balloons shrink towards the critical point and vanish for sufficiently small K. The rolls are replaced by squares at K = 0.2356 (calculated using the weakly nonlinear theory). The results with H = 0.1 suggest that cases of thin poorly conducting slabs might remain stable at even larger Rayleigh numbers.…”
Section: Stability Regionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The balloons are shifted towards smaller wavenumbers with decreased conductivity of the slabs. As was found for cases of infinitely thick slabs by Westerburg & Busse (2001), the balloons shrink towards the critical point and vanish for sufficiently small K. The rolls are replaced by squares at K = 0.2356 (calculated using the weakly nonlinear theory). The results with H = 0.1 suggest that cases of thin poorly conducting slabs might remain stable at even larger Rayleigh numbers.…”
Section: Stability Regionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The Nusselt number decreases significantly with increased thickness of the slabs. It follows from the discussion above that the heat transfer in the case of infinitely thick slabs by Westerburg & Busse (2001) is not at all influenced by the convection in the fluid layer. From (3.3), it is realized that the change of their Nusselt number is related entirely to the change of their temperature scale, namely the difference between the mean temperatures at the fluid boundaries, which depends not only on the prescribed outer temperature difference, T , but also on the steady solution itself.…”
Section: Steady Solutions and Their Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A basic consideration in investigating the influence of poorly conducting boundaries on convection is the choice of thermal boundary conditions (BCs). Numerous researchers have concentrated solely on idealized fixed flux conditions corresponding to perfectly insulating boundaries (for instance ; Otero et al (2002); Verzicco & Sreenivasan (2008); Johnston & Doering (2009)), while other studies (including Sparrow et al (1964); Gertsberg & Sivashinsky (1981); Westerburg & Busse (2001)) have imposed more general mixed conditions of fixed Biot number η at the fluid boundaries. Note, though, that the Biot number in general depends on the horizontal "disturbance" wave number in the plates (Normand et al 1977, Section V.C.1).…”
Section: Effect Of Imperfectly Conducting Plates Bounding the Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the convection flow starts, it distorts the originally horizontal isotherms. Since, this deviation from the basic state occurs in the fluid layer as well as in the wall boundary, the wavelength of the convection pattern becomes larger with decreasing ξ[36]. From mathematical point of view, the decrease of Ra c is caused by the weakening of the thermal boundary condition(29) for θ as ξ decreases from 10 3 to 10 −3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%