We introduce a high-sensitivity broadband stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) setup featuring wide spectral coverage (up to 500 cm −1) and high-frequency resolution (≈20 cm −1). The system combines a narrowband Stokes pulse, obtained by spectral filtering an Yb laser, with a broadband pump pulse generated by a home-built optical parametric oscillator. A single-channel lock-in amplifier connected to a single-pixel photodiode measures the stimulated Raman loss signal, whose spectrum is scanned rapidly using a galvanometric mirror after the sample. We use the in-line balanced detection approach to suppress laser fluctuations and achieve close to shot-noise-limited sensitivity. The setup is capable of measuring accurately the SRS spectra of several solvents and of obtaining hyperspectral data cubes consisting in the broadband SRS microscopy images of polymer beads test samples as well as of the distribution of different biological substances within plant cell walls. KEYWORDS coherent Raman spectroscopy, hyperspectral microscopy, nonlinear optical microscopy, optical parametric oscillators, stimulated Raman scattering 1 | INTRODUCTION Coherent Raman scattering (CRS) microscopy [1-3] allows label-free identification of molecules based on their intrinsic vibrational response, which provides a fingerprint of their chemical structure. CRS exploits the resonant third-order nonlinear optical signal generated in a sample by interaction with two light pulses, the pump (at frequency ω p) and the Stokes (at frequency ω S), when their frequency detuning ω p-ω S matches a vibrational frequency Ω of the molecule. In coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, [4-7] the response is read at the anti-Stokes frequency ω aS = ω p + Ω, whereas in stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), [8-10] the nonlinear signal is imprinted on the pump/Stokes pulses themselves, in the form of Stokes pulse amplification (stimulated Raman gain, SRG) or pump pulse attenuation (stimulated Raman loss, SRL). Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering suffers from the superposition with a frequency-independent nonresonant background, which often distorts and masks the resonant signal of interest [11,12] ; SRS, on the other hand, is almost free from nonlinear background and directly measures the resonant signal, making it the CRS microscopy technique of choice.