3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iwbf.2015.7110223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprint skin moisture impact on biometric performance

Abstract: Dry or wet fingers have an impact on biometric performance and the measurement of skin characteristics is important for actionable quality. We collected a ground truth fingerprint skin moisture dataset containing 6600 samples from 33 subjects using 5 optical sensors, two claimed to work well in extreme skin moisture conditions. Controlling conditions by applying cream, alcohol and water we performed objective measurements of skin moisture prior to each fingerprint capture. Analyzing the relationship between me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the amount of moisture on users' fingers has an impact on overall biometric performance [114], the effects of humidity on the survival of microorganisms on environmental surfaces such as fingerprint scanners vary greatly between different classes of microorganisms and are significantly influenced by the presence of a cell wall or protective membrane.…”
Section: Relative Humidity Temperature and Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the amount of moisture on users' fingers has an impact on overall biometric performance [114], the effects of humidity on the survival of microorganisms on environmental surfaces such as fingerprint scanners vary greatly between different classes of microorganisms and are significantly influenced by the presence of a cell wall or protective membrane.…”
Section: Relative Humidity Temperature and Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that quality of the fingerprint impacts biometric system performance was recognized by Olsen et al [9]. In their research, the authors collected database of 6600 fingerprints collected from 33 persons, by the use of five different optical fingerprint sensors.…”
Section: Fingerprint Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the calculation results for several different cases where the sensor patterns are composed of different numbers of arrays, while the fingerprint sensing pixel pitches are in the reasonable range of 70-85 μm, which correspond to resolutions of 300-363 dpi. Fingerprint images in this resolution range can be effectively used in commercial devices employing a pattern-based matching algorithm 12,21 . The difference between C M-R and C M-V , denoted ΔC M , is shown in the table instead of the capacitance values because the amplitude of the sensor output signal is determined by ΔC M .…”
Section: Projected Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases, these sensors may not work as satisfactorily as conventional fingerprint sensors. The optical underdisplay fingerprint sensor, which recognizes a fingerprint using the difference in light reflected at the finger ridge and valley areas, has an issue in recognizing dry fingers, which cannot make uniform and consistent contact with the surface of the sensor cover layer 12,13 . This issue arises because the sensor may identify a finger ridge area, which is not making good surface contact, as a valley area since part of the light will be reflected at the cover surface instead of propagating through the finger on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%