2010 the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccae.2010.5451426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprint pore extraction based on Marker controlled Watershed Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their algorithm is also computational expensive because it requires a lot of post-processing steps to removing false pores which are not useful for matching. Malathi et al [12] used marker controlled watershed segmentation to effectively identify fingerprint pores. Their algorithm was tested on a database consisting of only 500dpi fingerprint images.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their algorithm is also computational expensive because it requires a lot of post-processing steps to removing false pores which are not useful for matching. Malathi et al [12] used marker controlled watershed segmentation to effectively identify fingerprint pores. Their algorithm was tested on a database consisting of only 500dpi fingerprint images.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of methods for extracting the coordinates of the pores deal with touch-based fingerprint images. These methods use different techniques to estimate the shape of the pores from the samples, such as: Gabor filters [19], watershed segmentation [32], wavelet transforms [1,19], or morphological operators [5]. To the best of our knowledge, the study presented in [49] is the only attempt of automatic estimation of the pores from latent images.…”
Section: Extraction Of Pores From Fingerprint Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of recognition, methods for extracting the positions of the pores use Gabor Filters [25], wavelet transforms [25], [26], watershed segmentation [27], or morphological operators [28]. Matching methods specifically designed for pores use ICP [25], RANSAC [29], local binary patterns [30], Delaunay triangulation [26], or local features [29], [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%