2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.87.054502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingering of Chemical Fronts in Porous Media

Abstract: The influence of chemical reactions on the hydrodynamical fingering instability is analyzed for miscible systems in porous media. Using a realistic reaction scheme, it is shown that the stability of chemical fronts towards density fingering crucially depends on the width and the speed of the front which are functions of chemical parameters. The major difference between the pure and chemically driven fingering is that, in the presence of chemical reactions, the dispersion curves do not vary in time which has im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow is then expected to be unstable in the case of the monotonically increasing and non-monotonic viscosity profiles but stable in the case of the monotonically decreasing profiles. In this sense, the present study bears some similarities with earlier ones dealing with nonmonotonic viscosity profiles (Manickam & Homsy 1993;Loggia et al 1995;Loggia, Salin & Yortsos 1998;Pankiewitz & Meiburg 1999;De Wit, Bertho & Martin 2005;Schafroth, Goyal & Meiburg 2007). However, there is a fundamental difference arising from the important role of chemistry.…”
Section: Monotonic Versus Non-monotonic Viscosity Profilessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The flow is then expected to be unstable in the case of the monotonically increasing and non-monotonic viscosity profiles but stable in the case of the monotonically decreasing profiles. In this sense, the present study bears some similarities with earlier ones dealing with nonmonotonic viscosity profiles (Manickam & Homsy 1993;Loggia et al 1995;Loggia, Salin & Yortsos 1998;Pankiewitz & Meiburg 1999;De Wit, Bertho & Martin 2005;Schafroth, Goyal & Meiburg 2007). However, there is a fundamental difference arising from the important role of chemistry.…”
Section: Monotonic Versus Non-monotonic Viscosity Profilessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Change of the instability in time The classical non-reactive VF is known to weaken in time when diffusion smoothes out unstable viscosity gradients (Tan & Homsy 1986;De Wit et al 2005). Chemical reactions are obviously changing this picture as readily seen in figure 8 for R b = 0.…”
Section: Unstable Initial Reactant Front (Rmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case R = 0, or equivalently δ → ∞, in (3.10) yields 12) which corresponds to the pure RT instability of a layer of A above the pure solvent where B 0 = 0, which is always unstable (see Manickam &Homsy 1995 andDe Wit 2001). Such a situation has been studied experimentally in Hele-Shaw cells by Fernandez et al (2002) for instance.…”
Section: Linear Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One quantity that would make sense to follow in time would be the mean flux obtained by averaging the flux along the transverse coordinate. Even in that case, one would, in addition, need to make ensemble average of this mean flux on several simulations made for a single set of parameters but different noise seeding the initial condition (De Wit, Bertho, Martin 2005). To perform a parametric study of the scalings of such statistical ensemble averages of mean fluxes is beyond the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Nonlinear Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%