2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06170.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingering Convection: the Interplay of Small and Large Scales

Abstract: Direct numerical simulations of two‐dimensional fingering convection are presented. They show the growth of a finger‐zone from a region of high gradients of temperature and salinity set in the initial conditions and the appearance of large‐scale convective cells in the homogeneous layers above and below it. The interaction between the finger‐zone and the convection is described and the vertical fluxes are compared with a theoretical scaling law.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The laboratory values of C S have been found to overestimate the oceanic fluxes by at least an order of magnitude, a discrepancy that may indicate that the effective exponent of the flux law realized in the oceanic conditions exceeds 4/3. Direct numerical simulations by Ozgokmen, Essenkov & Olson (1998) resulted in an approximate agreement with the 4/3 law over most of the explored parameter range, but with large deviations at high and low values of S, whereas simulations in Paparella (2000) suggest that the exponent of the flux law consistently exceeds 4/3 and could be as high as b = 2. The reader is referred to Kunze (2003) for a discussion of these and other simple models of interfacial fluxes.…”
Section: Flux Lawsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The laboratory values of C S have been found to overestimate the oceanic fluxes by at least an order of magnitude, a discrepancy that may indicate that the effective exponent of the flux law realized in the oceanic conditions exceeds 4/3. Direct numerical simulations by Ozgokmen, Essenkov & Olson (1998) resulted in an approximate agreement with the 4/3 law over most of the explored parameter range, but with large deviations at high and low values of S, whereas simulations in Paparella (2000) suggest that the exponent of the flux law consistently exceeds 4/3 and could be as high as b = 2. The reader is referred to Kunze (2003) for a discussion of these and other simple models of interfacial fluxes.…”
Section: Flux Lawsmentioning
confidence: 98%