Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics 2022
DOI: 10.5220/0011327100003271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finger Type Classification with Deep Convolution Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the proposed EfficientNetB0-PCA-RF was 99.91 percent, while that of the standard EfficientNet-B0 network was only 82.76 percent. And in comparison to previously published research using different techniques [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] summarized in Table 1. In [8], [11] the structure was built for CNN from scratch, and [10] used CNN and SVM, whereas [12] used CNN and Naïve Bayes for various fingerprint classifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy of the proposed EfficientNetB0-PCA-RF was 99.91 percent, while that of the standard EfficientNet-B0 network was only 82.76 percent. And in comparison to previously published research using different techniques [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] summarized in Table 1. In [8], [11] the structure was built for CNN from scratch, and [10] used CNN and SVM, whereas [12] used CNN and Naïve Bayes for various fingerprint classifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…And in comparison to previously published research using different techniques [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] summarized in Table 1. In [8], [11] the structure was built for CNN from scratch, and [10] used CNN and SVM, whereas [12] used CNN and Naïve Bayes for various fingerprint classifications. Figure 6 shows the comparison of the accuracy of our proposed methods with the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation