Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2737856.2737868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-tuning Kleine's choice framework

Abstract: Kleine's choice framework (CF) is a significant advance in the theorization of ICTD. Using the findings of an intervention imbedded within a participatory action research project, we propose six amendments which could enhance the CF's usefulness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along these lines, we consider how virtual social networks and mobile phones impact perceived and actual avenues for refugee women in camps to pursue higher education. Another way to describe this relationship between structure and agency is to consider individual options, decisions, and actions in relation to existing structures towards desired goals (Attwood & May 2015).…”
Section: Socio-technical Theory and Pathways To Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines, we consider how virtual social networks and mobile phones impact perceived and actual avenues for refugee women in camps to pursue higher education. Another way to describe this relationship between structure and agency is to consider individual options, decisions, and actions in relation to existing structures towards desired goals (Attwood & May 2015).…”
Section: Socio-technical Theory and Pathways To Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this framework furthers the academic discourse on operationalising the CA by demonstrating the inclusion of a person's agency and conversion factors that inhibit or enhance utilisation of opportunities and choices in the realisation of benefits. This further demonstrates that the amendments proposed by Attwood and May (2015) in respect of agency are indeed practical.…”
Section: Application Of the Benefits Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…As such, the study was designed using interviews, focus groups, and a short survey. Case studies have often been used in similar studies to this research such as Akinsola, Herselman, and Jacobs (), Alao (), and Attwood and May ().…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kleine presented the CF as a way of operationalizing the capability approach and visualizing the elements of a systemic conceptualization of the development process. The CF was developed in the field of Information and Communication Technology and Development (ICTD), but it has found its way into applied human development (Attwood & May, 2015). The CF focuses extensively on addressing social structure, individual agency, the degree of empowerment/dimension of choice and the outcome (Attwood & May, 2015; Noruwana et al, 2018) and analyses the development outcomes by describing the systemic relationships between agency, structure and choice (Attwood & May, 2015; Kleine, 2009a, 2009b; Noruwana et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CF was developed in the field of Information and Communication Technology and Development (ICTD), but it has found its way into applied human development (Attwood & May, 2015). The CF focuses extensively on addressing social structure, individual agency, the degree of empowerment/dimension of choice and the outcome (Attwood & May, 2015; Noruwana et al, 2018) and analyses the development outcomes by describing the systemic relationships between agency, structure and choice (Attwood & May, 2015; Kleine, 2009a, 2009b; Noruwana et al, 2018). The development outcomes are made up of primary and secondary choices where the individual choices (which will vary according to the structures and the agency of the individual) will lead to secondary outcomes (Kleine, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%