“Fine synergies” describe motor adaptation in people with drop foot in a way that supplements traditional “coarse synergies”

Abstract

Synergy analysis via dimensionality reduction is a standard approach in biomechanics to capture the dominant features of limb kinematics or muscle activation signals, which can be called “coarse synergies.” Here we demonstrate that the less dominant features of these signals, which are often explicitly disregarded or considered noise, can nevertheless exhibit “fine synergies” that reveal subtle, yet functionally important, adaptations. To find the coarse synergies, we applied non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to unilateral EMG data from eight muscles of the involved leg in ten people with drop-foot (DF), and of the right leg of 16 unimpaired (control) participants. We then extracted the fine synergies for each group by removing the coarse synergies (i.e., first two factors explaining ≥85% of variance) from the data and applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to those residuals. Surprisingly, the time histories and structure of the coarse EMG synergies showed few differences between DF and controls—even though the kinematics of drop-foot gait is evidently different from unimpaired gait. In contrast, the structure of the fine EMG synergies (as per their PCA loadings) showed significant differences between groups. In particular, loadings for Tibialis Anterior, Peroneus Longus, Gastrocnemius Lateralis, Biceps and Rectus Femoris, Vastus Medialis and Lateralis muscles differed between groups (p<0.05). We conclude that the multiple differences found in the structure of the fine synergies extracted from EMG in people with drop-foot vs. unimpaired controls—not visible in the coarse synergies—likely reflect differences in their motor strategies. Coarse synergies, in contrast, seem to mostly reflect the gross features of EMG in bipedal gait that must be met by all participants—and thus show few differences between groups. However, drawing insights into the clinical origin of these differences requires well-controlled clinical trials. We propose that fine synergies should not be disregarded in biomechanical analysis, as they may be more informative of the disruption and adaptation of muscle coordination strategies in participants due to drop-foot, age and/or other gait impairments.

An alpha- to gamma-motoneurone collateral can mitigate velocity-dependent stretch reflexes during voluntary movement: A computational study

“…Admittedly, not all activations patterns or movements will be seen in a macaque, and non-reaching (i.e., cyclical) movements would necessitate different coordination patterns. However, had we assumed a priori a particular control strategy, optimization, set of motor primitives [43], synergistic or Bayesian control law [41, 44], our results could be limited by those assumptions, and would be less general and convincing.…”

Dynamical Analyses Show That Professional Archers Exhibit Tighter, Finer and More Fluid Dynamical Control Than Neophytes

“…Thus, we applied principal component analysis (PCA) to each body part's 3D time series to reduce the dimensionality (See Figure 2). PCA is a widely employed technique in the fields of biomechanics [23,24] and sports [25,26] to project data into lower dimensions efficiently. The variance explained by the first PC of all body parts is shown in Table 2.…”

The Impact of Induced Acceleration Perturbations in Selected Phases of the Gait Cycle on Kinematic and Kinetic Parameters

“…Research focused on perturbations is strictly related to the adaptive functions of the human neuromuscular system that allow the maintenance of balance and a straight position [4,6,[20][21][22]. The elderly, particularly vulnerable to falls, are a primary focus due to their diminished ability to adapt to external disturbances, with nearly a quarter of this population at risk [23][24][25].…”