2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine structure effective collision strengths for the electron impact excitation of Al III

Abstract: Abstract.A 10-state R-matrix calculation has been carried out to generate fine structure effective collision strengths for the electron impact excitation of doubly ionized aluminium. The target states are represented by configuration interaction wavefunctions and consist of the 10 lowest LS states -(2p 6 )3s, 3p, ..., 5p, 5d. These 10 target states give rise to 17 fine structure levels and 136 possible transitions. The fine structure collision strengths were obtained by transforming to a jj-coupling scheme usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (only decays to the 5 lowest-lying levels are shown). For Al 2+ , the present results agree to within 20% when compared with those available from Hudson & Bell (2005) and NIST's v.3 compilation. For Fe 15+ , a complete set of data from Aggarwal & Keenan (2006) is available and so more transitions are compared.…”
Section: Structure: Gf-valuessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 (only decays to the 5 lowest-lying levels are shown). For Al 2+ , the present results agree to within 20% when compared with those available from Hudson & Bell (2005) and NIST's v.3 compilation. For Fe 15+ , a complete set of data from Aggarwal & Keenan (2006) is available and so more transitions are compared.…”
Section: Structure: Gf-valuessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As shown in Fig. 4a, Hudson & Bell (2005). Middle: Fe 15+ ; EGM99 refers to the Breit-Pauli R-matrix results of Eissner et al (1999) and AK06 to the Dirac R-matrix results of Aggarwal & Keenan (2006).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Results For ω and υmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations