Understanding foraging behavior is important for addressing ecological questions about air-breathing marine vertebrates. However, the inability to directly observe them underwater has made it difficult to classify and understand their foraging behaviors. We equipped 8 free-ranging, adult Weddell seals with animal-borne video and data recorders (VDRs) to monitor their underwater behavior. Eighteen dive descriptors summarizing the duration, depth, speed, stroking frequency, gliding, and energetic cost of 234 dives were calculated. Dive descriptors were included in nonhierarchical cluster analyses that identified 5 groups of dives. Eight of the 18 dive descriptors contributed strongly to the discrimination between dive groups. Presence of prey on the video record confirmed Groups 1, 4, and 5 as foraging dives. Group 1 dives were deep and exceeded the estimated aerobic dive limit, while Group 4 dives were also deep but probably remained aerobic. Group 5 dives were shallow and aerobic. Comparisons with prior classifications showed that deep aerobic dives were similar in depth and duration to foraging dives identified in previous studies, but shallow aerobic dives represented a previously undescribed foraging category. Deep anaerobic dives also differed from previous classifications and were not indicative of benthic foraging, as was previously thought. The proportion of successful foraging dives (at least on prey encounter observed on video) varied among the groups and among locations with different bathymetry. The distribution of foraging dive types also varied among these locations. These results will help characterize foraging activity of Weddell seals and provide a better understanding of the energetic costs and foraging strategies of diving marine predators.
KEY WORDS: Marine mammal · Behavior · Classification · Silverfish · Geographical variation · McMurdo SoundResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Mar Ecol Prog Ser 365: 263-275, 2008 1993, Lehner 1996). For example, foraging behavior can be subdivided into search, pursuit, and handling. The capacity for identifying behavioral categories, specific or general, usually depends on the extent to which a researcher can observe the animal (Hinde 1982).For many years, the challenges associated with monitoring the underwater excursions of free-ranging diving mammals have made it difficult to classify their behavior with certainty (Davis et al. 2003, Fuiman et al. 2007). Methods such as SCUBA, fixed-location cameras, remotely operated vehicles, and manned submersibles provide only short glimpses of highly mobile animals (Davis et al. 1999, Kooyman 2004, Block 2005. New developments in bio-logging technology (i.e. the use of animal-borne instruments to gather data) have helped overcome some of these challenges. The use of time-depth recorders and satellite-linked time-depth recorders to collect information about the depth, duration, and location of dives has greatly increased our knowledge of the diving behavior and m...