1998
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure with Nonuniform Distribution of Individuals

Abstract: This paper presents the first theoretical study of spatial genetic structure within nonuniformly distributed continuous plant populations. A novel individual-based model of isolation by distance was constructed to simulate genetic evolution within such populations. We found larger values of spatial genetic autocorrelations in highly clumped populations than in uniformly distributed populations. Most of this difference was caused by differences in mean dispersal distances, but aggregation probably also produced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As originally pointed out by Felsenstein (1975Felsenstein ( , 1979, and more recently by Epperson et al (1999), there is still no accepted theory for the decay function of the probability of IBD with distance within a continuous population ; only simulation results are available (Rohlf & Schnell, 1971 ;Doligez et al, 1998 ;Epperson et al, 1999). We were forced to make an arbitrary choice of decay functions, and it is reassuring that a change in that function makes little difference, although the need for proper (closed form) theory remains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As originally pointed out by Felsenstein (1975Felsenstein ( , 1979, and more recently by Epperson et al (1999), there is still no accepted theory for the decay function of the probability of IBD with distance within a continuous population ; only simulation results are available (Rohlf & Schnell, 1971 ;Doligez et al, 1998 ;Epperson et al, 1999). We were forced to make an arbitrary choice of decay functions, and it is reassuring that a change in that function makes little difference, although the need for proper (closed form) theory remains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the impact of these factors is yet scarce, possibly explaining the delayed dilution of the postdisturbance spatial genetic structure. Populations with even age structure or non-overlapping generations are expected to have more spatial structure than populations with multiple overlapping generations (Doligez et al 1998;Jones and Hubbell 2006;Schnabel et al 1991). Hence, in Quilanlahue, the wider and more flattened age distribution (mean age 170 years) indicates that mature trees were recruited over a longer period probably by high outcrossing rates and seed sources, leading to a weaker spatial genetic structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means the A. sieboldii metapopulation in Eobi valley has genetically significantly differentiated despite the narrow range. It is estimated there was little genetic flow (N m = 0.412) between subpopulations, which means that A. sieboldii metapopulation of the Eobi valley formed a spatial genetic structure (Doligez et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%