2011
DOI: 10.1071/mf10154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-scale spatial and seasonal partitioning among large sharks and other elasmobranchs in south-eastern Queensland, Australia

Abstract: Abstract. Our understanding of the ecological role of larger elasmobranchs is limited by a lack of information on their spatial and seasonal abundance. Analysis of 14 years of gill-net catch data in south-eastern Queensland, Australia, revealed that the species composition of large sharks and other elasmobranchs significantly differed among beaches and seasons. Spinner sharks (Carcharhinus brevipinna) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.) comprised nearly half the catch of all elasmobranchs. Although the distri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…boat traffic) may displace sharks from otherwise suitable habitat (e.g. Carrier & Pratt 1998, Garla et al 2006, Ward-Paige et al 2010, Taylor et al 2011. Consequently, the high degree of human activity in Zone 4, in comparison to Zones 1 and 2, may influence the limited use of this area by juvenile sand tigers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…boat traffic) may displace sharks from otherwise suitable habitat (e.g. Carrier & Pratt 1998, Garla et al 2006, Ward-Paige et al 2010, Taylor et al 2011. Consequently, the high degree of human activity in Zone 4, in comparison to Zones 1 and 2, may influence the limited use of this area by juvenile sand tigers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the results of this study, and more extensive tracking of mobile species, are crucial to development of effective conservation and management policy. Currently the largest threats to adult C. leucas in eastern Australia are fishing activities including recreational and commercial fisheries (Macbeth et al, 2009), bather protection programs (Reid et al, 2011;Taylor et al, 2011), and habitat degradation (e.g., loss of mangrove habitat).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management arrangements for bull sharks vary between Queensland (QLD) and New South Wales (NSW), the two state jurisdictions of eastern Australia where bull sharks occur. The species is not protected in either jurisdiction, and both QLD and NSW target larger C. leucas in shark control programs at popular swimming beaches (Reid et al, 2011;Taylor et al, 2011). Catches in NSW commercial fisheries occur mostly in the Ocean Trap and Line Fishery where a longline fishery has targeted large sharks (Macbeth et al, 2009).…”
Section: Marine Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpfendorfer 1992), status (e.g. Dudley and Simpfendorfer 2006) and ecology (Taylor et al 2011). Reid et al (2011) reported on decadal trends in species caught by the New South Wales shark-control program, providing a long time series of data on the abundance of large sharks in this region.…”
Section: The Effects Of a Changing Perception Of Sharksmentioning
confidence: 99%