Fine-scale patterns driving dynamic functional connectivity provide meaningful brain parcellations

Abstract

Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) derived from restingstate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allows identifying large-scale functional brain networks based on spontaneous activity and their temporal reconfigurations. Due to limited memory and computational resources, these pairwise measures are typically computed for a set of brain regions from a pre-defined brain atlas, which choice is nontrivial and might influence results. Here, we first leverage the availability of dynamic information and new computational methods to retrieve dFC at the finest voxel level in terms of dominant patterns of fluctuations, and, second, we demonstrate that this new representation is informative to derive meaningful brain parcellations that capture both long-range interactions and fine-scale local organization. We analyzed resting-state fMRI of 54 healthy participants from the Human Connectome Project. For each position of a temporal window, we determined eigenvector centrality of the windowed fMRI data at the voxel level. These were then concatenated across time and subjects and clustered into the most representative dominant patterns (RDPs). Each voxel was then labeled according to a binary code indicating positive or negative contribution to each of the RDPs. We obtained a 36-label parcellation displaying long-range interactions with remarkable hemispherical symmetry. By separating contiguous regions, a finer-scale parcellation of 448 areas was also retrieved, showing consistency with known connectivity of cortical/subcortical structures including thalamus. Our contribution bridges the gap between voxel-based approaches and graph theoretical analysis.Index Terms-functional MRI, dynamic functional connectivity, brain networks, fine-scale brain parcellation.

Combined static and dynamic functional connectivity signatures differentiating bipolar depression from major depressive disorder

“…The thalamus participates in the FST circuit by relaying striatal inputs to the frontal regions and providing feedback to the striatum (Metzger et al, 2013). In addition, dynamic FC of the thalamus promotes integration of information across the FST loop (Preti and Ville, 2017). Elevated temporal variation in thalamic connectivity is consistent with the notion that primary abnormalities in the FST circuit are related to abnormal emotional and cognitive processing in BDd (Teng et al, 2014).…”