2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79575-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-scale genetic structure in the critically endangered red-fronted macaw in the absence of geographic and ecological barriers

Abstract: Behavioural and socio-cultural traits are recognized in the restriction of gene flow in species with high cognitive capacity and complex societies. This isolation by social barriers has been generally overlooked in threatened species by assuming disrupted gene flow due to population fragmentation and decline. We examine the genetic structure and ecology of the global population of the Critically Endangered red-fronted macaw (Ara rubrogenys), an endemic species to the inter-Andean valleys of Bolivia. We found a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(180 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its restricted range, the population is structured in genetic clusters with low or null gene flow among them, despite that some colonies are separated by few tens of kilometers, that there are no ecological barriers and that macaws make larger daily and seasonal movements for feeding. Therefore, it is highly improbable that the species could colonize very distant areas in its future niche suitability [81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its restricted range, the population is structured in genetic clusters with low or null gene flow among them, despite that some colonies are separated by few tens of kilometers, that there are no ecological barriers and that macaws make larger daily and seasonal movements for feeding. Therefore, it is highly improbable that the species could colonize very distant areas in its future niche suitability [81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Ridgely (1981; also see Lanning 1991) reported that several hundred Red-fronted Macaws were trapped annually for the international pet trade in the late 1970s (most likely continuing at the same rate through to at least the early 1980s), which could add up to well over 1,000 birds removed from the wild population during this period. Blanco et al (2021), however, found no clear evidence of strong genetic erosion in the population as a whole during recent decades, but rather during the last centuries or millennia, possibly coinciding with the expansion of the Incan Empire in the 15 th century and concomitant intense habitat transformation in Bolivia's inter-Andean dry valleys. Today, main threats to the species are continued habitat loss and degradation (due to forest conversion to agriculture, overgrazing, domestic and industrial firewood cutting), nest-poaching and trapping of adults for local and national pet supply and persecution of the species by local farmers as a crop pest, fuelling a presumed on-going rapid population decline (Tella et al 2013, Pires et al 2016, BirdLife International 2021b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, no geographical or ecological barriers were found for the Red-fronted Macaw Ara rubrogenys across inter-Andean valleys in Bolivia. This suggests that social factors might reinforce their philopatry-related genetic structure, as cliffs with nest sites are not continuously distributed across the landscape [206]. Landscape genetics was also used to study the historical and current distributions of the Crimson Rosella Platycercus elegans complex, showing that population expansion followed by secondary contact and hybridization might be responsible for their present genetic structure [207].…”
Section: Molecular Ecology and Landscape Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%