2014
DOI: 10.1086/675076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-scale dispersal in a stream caddisfly inferred from spatial autocorrelation of microsatellite markers

Abstract: Most population genetic studies in streams infer long-term patterns of gene flow by calculating fixation indices (e.g., F ST ) among sampled populations. In more-recent analytical methods, the need to assign individuals to populations a priori (clustering algorithms) is relaxed, and spatial autocorrelation analysis of allele frequencies (SA) is used to infer finer-scale and potentially short-term dispersal distances. We applied multiple methods to study the population genetic structure of the riverine caddisfl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These low levels of genetic differentiation and large cluster sizes are comparable with those reported for aquatic insects achieving downstream drift and adult flight (e.g. caddisflies; Yaegashi, Watanabe, Monaghan, & Omura, ). This suggests widespread gene flow in the hyporheic corridor, with isolation by distance occurring at a scale of tens of kilometres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These low levels of genetic differentiation and large cluster sizes are comparable with those reported for aquatic insects achieving downstream drift and adult flight (e.g. caddisflies; Yaegashi, Watanabe, Monaghan, & Omura, ). This suggests widespread gene flow in the hyporheic corridor, with isolation by distance occurring at a scale of tens of kilometres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Also, the pattern of higher genetic differentiation among upstream demes than downstream demes and smaller STRUCTURE cluster size in upstream reaches (see Figure ) is proposed to reflect increased geomorphic constraints to the migration of P. walteri in steep slope channels that accumulate thinner and more discontinuous alluvial deposits. A greater genetic structure among upstream populations of surface aquatic organisms has long been considered as a general spatial pattern (Hughes, ; Hughes et al., ; Storfer, Murphy, Spear, Holderegger, & Waits, ; Yaegashi et al., ; but see Paz‐Vinas et al., ). Here, we provide the first evidence that this pattern also applies to interstitial organisms and that it varies in magnitude among river corridors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many studies demonstrated the presence of low divergence between aquatic insect species, with a typical pattern of higher variability within than between populations (Alp et al, 2012;Paris et al, 2010;Sivaramakrishnan et al, 2014;Yaegashi et al, 2014), as also found in this case. Moreover, spatial autocorrelation of genetic variability along rivers for a trichopteran species was estimated to persist in a range of 12-18 km (Yaegashi et al, 2014), which roughly corresponds to the estimated flight dispersal of the species and by far longer than the distance (1 km) between the two stations studied in the river Bormida. All this suggests that other factors than geographical isolation or distance may be considered to explain the evidenced divergence in the case of the populations of H. modesta of the Bormida.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous population genetic studies of headwater insect species have mainly used DNA sequencing and AFLPs to assess regional patterns and revealed strong catchment differentiation (e.g. Hughes et al ., ; Wishart & Hughes, ; Lehrian et al ., ; Yaegashi et al ., ), strong differentiation within catchments (Monaghan et al ., ) or variation among codistributed taxa (Monaghan et al ., ; Sabando et al ., ). A few examples also show effective dispersal with limited population structure (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%