2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1853-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine root turnover and litter production of Norway spruce in a long-term temperature and nutrient manipulation experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
6
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the independent FRB was clearly smaller than the FRB based on our ingrowth cores. However, the FRT using both the maximum and mean biomass values somehow agreed with studies of mineral soils by Hansson et al (2013) in a mixed conifer stand and Leppälammi-Kujansuu et al (2014) in a sprucedominated stand. The FRT estimated, using the biomass found in the ingrowth cores, rather than using the independent FRB, may in fact be more realistic, since both the FRP and FRB in the cores represent the same fineroot system.…”
Section: Betula Pubescenssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is because the independent FRB was clearly smaller than the FRB based on our ingrowth cores. However, the FRT using both the maximum and mean biomass values somehow agreed with studies of mineral soils by Hansson et al (2013) in a mixed conifer stand and Leppälammi-Kujansuu et al (2014) in a sprucedominated stand. The FRT estimated, using the biomass found in the ingrowth cores, rather than using the independent FRB, may in fact be more realistic, since both the FRP and FRB in the cores represent the same fineroot system.…”
Section: Betula Pubescenssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This assumption is supported also by literature (e.g. Leppälammi-Kujansuu et al 2013) and suggested by the gently higher thickness of surface humus layer in the soil cores (Table 3). However, since neither the differences in C tot , N tot and S tot concentrations nor the differences in the compressed humus layer were significant, no final conclusions can be drawn at this moment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the variation in the total production and turnover rates from year to year has generally been recorded within a single tree species and/or stand (Burke and Raynal 1994;Rytter 2013;Leppälammi-Kujansuu et al 2014), and the interannual variability in the fine root turnover rate was equal to or greater than the difference among species obtained for some temperate tree species (McCormack et al 2014). In addition, soil depth could also have a major influence on the fine root dynamics of shrubs (Aerts et al 1989;Baddeley and Watson 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in unit of root length m -2 ). The previous studies showed that there was a strong positive correlation between the number and the length of fine roots (Leppälammi-Kujansuu et al 2014) and the fine root production and turnover rates calculated using the root length were similar to those calculated using the root number (McCormack et al 2014). Therefore, the fine root production and turnover rate were calculated using the numbers of roots produced instead of the root length (West et al 2004;McCormack et al 2014).…”
Section: Fine Root Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 93%