2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-009-9162-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine pore mouth structure of molecular sieve carbon with GCMC-assisted supercritical gas adsorption analysis

Abstract: N 2 adsorption isotherms of molecular sieve carbon were measured at 77 K and 303 K. The Ar adsorption isotherms of molecular sieve carbon samples were also measured at 303 K. The grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation technique was applied to calculate the N 2 and Ar adsorption isotherms at 303 K using the ultramicropore volume determined by H 2 O adsorption. The comparative method of experimental and simulated isotherms of supercritical N 2 and Ar at 303 K gave the width of the micropore mouth of the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of ultramicropores using the above-mentioned probe molecules is often unsuccessful. The adsorption of CO 2 and water under ambient conditions can be measured to evaluate ultramicropores, because the effective sizes of CO 2 and water at ambient temperatures are smaller than that of N 2 [32][33][34][35][36][37]. The measurement of He adsorption at extremely low temperatures has also been proposed as a method for the assessment of ultramicropores [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of ultramicropores using the above-mentioned probe molecules is often unsuccessful. The adsorption of CO 2 and water under ambient conditions can be measured to evaluate ultramicropores, because the effective sizes of CO 2 and water at ambient temperatures are smaller than that of N 2 [32][33][34][35][36][37]. The measurement of He adsorption at extremely low temperatures has also been proposed as a method for the assessment of ultramicropores [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed value of 6 kJ/mol corresponds to the calculated value for a pore width of 0.7 nm using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations (Kowalczyk et al 2005). Since there are serious difficulties with pore structure evaluation using nitrogen adsorption for ultramicropores with widths of less than 0.7 nm (Kobori et al 2009), the estimated pore width of 0.7 nm for ACM is plausible.…”
Section: Nanopore Structuresmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, we need to elucidate the water-adsorbed state in the pore structure of nanodiamonds. Probe molecules nitrogen, argon, and water, among others, have been used to define the pore structure of porous adsorbent materials [18,19]. In the present study, we reveal the pore structure changes in nanodiamonds due to long-term heat treatment in vacuo by measurements of argon, nitrogen, and water adsorption and correlate them to water adsorptivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The pore structure of porous adsorbent materials can be described by the adsorption of specific probe molecules. The recommended values of kinetic diameters of probe molecules such as water, argon and nitrogen are 0.27 nm, 0.34 nm, and 0.36 nm [18,19]. The higher adsorption temperature of Ar (87 K) compared with that of the adsorption of nitrogen (77 K) favors the molecular diffusion in the restricted pores.…”
Section: Effect Of Heating Time On the Pore Structure Of Nanodiamond Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%