2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00102-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-needle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996–2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Intermediate grade DCIS was seen in 3 histopathological biopsies and all were diagnosed as “suspicious of malignancy” on FNAB. Overall, these results suggest the ability for FNAB to at least raise the suspicion of DCIS and are regarded as interesting, considering other reports that low- or intermediate-grade DCIS may be missed or high-grade DCIS over diagnosed by FNAB [31, 32]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intermediate grade DCIS was seen in 3 histopathological biopsies and all were diagnosed as “suspicious of malignancy” on FNAB. Overall, these results suggest the ability for FNAB to at least raise the suspicion of DCIS and are regarded as interesting, considering other reports that low- or intermediate-grade DCIS may be missed or high-grade DCIS over diagnosed by FNAB [31, 32]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…At the other end of the spectrum, comparing IC NST to ILC, the results again demonstrate that lobular neoplasia presents a cytological challenge [19, 21, 32]. But 52% of ILC were called malignant (16/31), 12 others were called “atypical” or “suspicious of malignancy,” and only two were true false negative cases on review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…23 This is the same figure that is usually given for core biopsies, [24][25][26][27] in which targeting the invasive component also is the main problem. In contrast, practically all palpable lesions will be invasive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy is being used increasingly as an alternative to surgical biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions that are suspicious or highly suggestive of malignancy. Fine-needle (20-25 gauge) aspiration cytology (FNAC) and large needle (11-18 gauge) core biopsy (CB), guided by either stereotaxis (stereotactic core needle biopsy; SCNB) or ultrasonography (ultrasound guided core biopsy; USCB), provide accurate percutaneous sampling of clinically occult breast lesions, while minimizing patient morbidity and cost [8][9][10][11]. Although some centers still advocate open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions [12,13], image-guided biopsy is becoming the standard of care in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast abnormalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%