2017
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20174560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine needle aspiration cytology- an accurate method for diagnosis of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases

Abstract: Background: Cutaneous metastases from carcinoma are relatively uncommon, usually representing late events in the course of internal malignancies and indicate a dismal outcome of patients. Aim of the study was undertaken to evaluate the role of FNAC as a diagnostic tool for diagnosis of cutaneous metastases of various internal malignancies as it is of great value in the early diagnosis.Methods: Study of cutaneous metastases was undertaken for the period from April 2013 to July 2017. Out of over 12000 cytology c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Srivastava et al16, Patel et al, Rastogi et al also noticed adenocarcinoma as most common cutaneous metastatic tumor. 10,17 The sensitivity FNA in the diagnosis of neoplastic nodular lesions in our study was 98.7% which was slightly less than the study by Jain et al18 while it is slightly more than study by Kusumastuti et al 19 The specificity and diagnostic accuracy of neoplastic nodular lesions was 94.6% and 97.4% respectively which was comparable to study by Jain et al 18…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Srivastava et al16, Patel et al, Rastogi et al also noticed adenocarcinoma as most common cutaneous metastatic tumor. 10,17 The sensitivity FNA in the diagnosis of neoplastic nodular lesions in our study was 98.7% which was slightly less than the study by Jain et al18 while it is slightly more than study by Kusumastuti et al 19 The specificity and diagnostic accuracy of neoplastic nodular lesions was 94.6% and 97.4% respectively which was comparable to study by Jain et al 18…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%