Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy vs. Ultrasound-Guided Transrectal Random Core Biopsy of the Prostate

Al-Abadi, H.

doi:10.1159/000332776

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The higher the serum PSA level, the higher the possibility of prostatic, in addition to that high serum PSA level does not mean prostatic carcinoma and vice versa (normal level does not mean benign prostatic condition). The results were in accordance other studies by Al-Abadi [19], Usama S. Al-Nasiri et al [22], Cho M et al [24], Nakamura et al [25], and Saleh AFM et al [23].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Most of cancer patients detected by DRE were in advanced stages, and the findings again suggested that not all patients with hard peripheral prostatic nodule(s) have prostatic cancer. Results agreed with studies by Al-Abadi [19], Usama S. Al-Nasiri et al [22], and Cullmann et al [27]. Transrectal sonography of prostate (TRUS) in current study detected hypoechoic prostatic lesions in 88 (80%) out of 110 studied patients.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Accuracy of Perineal Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Prostate under Ultra- Sound in Comparism with Transrectal Aspiration in Diagnosis of Prostatic Cancer

Aljebori¹

2018

IJCMG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Prostatic carcinoma is the commonest internal malignancy of adult males. Patients usually presenting withvoiding symptoms. Clinical suspicion of prostatic carcinoma depends on finding of one or more of the followings; hard prostaticnodule(s) on digital rectal examination (DRE), hypoechoic lesion on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and/or highserum level of prostatic specific antigen (PSA). Final diagnosis depends on FNAC and/or histopathology. Objective: This is acase control prospective study designed to evaluate the usefulness of FNAC of prostate through perineal skin under ultrasoundinstead of transrectal aspiration in diagnosis of suspicious prostatic conditions.Patients and Methods: One hundred and ten males with voiding symptoms and clinical suspicion of prostatic carcinoma wereparticipated in the study. Their ages were between 45 and 92 years. The aspiration was carried out as outpatient procedure.Results: Cytopathological results were; 64 (58.18%) positive, 4 (3.64%) suspicious, and 40 (36.36%) negative for prostaticcancer. Two specimens (1.82%) were inadequate for proper cytopathology. Results of histopathological examination of resectedspecimens from the same patients was very close to that of cytopathology with only two false positive and one falsenegative results. There was no any mentioned complication following aspiration, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracywere 98%, 95%, and 91.81% respectively, and all results were statistically significant with p-values <0.05.Conclusion: Percutaneous perineal FNAC of prostate under ultrasound is a safe, reliable, cost effective, and as accurate astransrectal FNAC in diagnosis of prostatic cancer.Keywords: Perineal prostatic FNAC, Prostatic Cytopathology, PSA, TRUS.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Accuracy of Perineal Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Prostate under Ultra- Sound in Comparism with Transrectal Aspiration in Diagnosis of Prostatic Cancer

Aljebori¹

2018

IJCMG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Al-Ababi compared the results of cytology and histology and found that the sensitivity of fine needle aspiration was 98.0% as compared to core biopsy sensitivity of 96.0% in carcinoma prostate. 39 [5][6][7]25,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] But our results were contradictory to the study of William and Ou et al 48,49 The evaluation of transrectal FNAC in prostatic carcinoma in our study showed a sensitivity of 88.8%, which is comparable to the findings by Saleh et al and Kaur et al, who have reported it to be 88.0% and 90% respectively. 47,50 Our study showed a positive predictive value of 100.0% in malignancy and 92.3% in benign prostatic hypertrophy on FNAC.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 73%

Evaluation of The Role of Transrectal Fine Needle Aspiration As A Diagnostic Modality in The Diseases of Prostate with Review of Literature

Khan

Jain

Juneja

et al. 2019

APALM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Transrectal fine needle aspiration cytology is feasible, reliable and highly sensitive diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of prostatic diseases. It mostly involves the elderly men, whose population is increasing in our country with the demographic shift of longitude. Aims and Objectives:To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and positive productive value of transrectal fine needle aspiration cytology in addition to other advantages so that it could be accepted as a primary screening tool in the selection of the patients for biopsy and treatment of prostatic lesions. Material and Methods:Transrectal FNAC was performed in 49 patients, in clinically diagnosed cases of prostate diseases. Histomorphology was also carried out.Results: Satisfactory smears could be obtained in 93.9% cases on first aspiration. The diagnostic accuracy for inflammatory disease was highest (100.0%), followed by malignant (88.8%), and benign lesions (82.9%), with a positive predictive value of 100.0% for malignancy of the prostate. False positivity was seen in 2.09% and false negativity in 11.2% cases. Conclusions:Transrectal FNAC is an accurate, sensitive, highly specific procedure with a high positive predictive value with negligible complication with an additional advantage of possible assessment of prognosis.

show abstract

“…[14] Al-Abadi compared the result of histology and cytology in 246 patients, 142 with benign lesions, 103 with prostatic carcinoma and 3 with atypical prostatic hyperplasia. [15] FNA procedure gave a sensitivity of 98%, whereas core biopsy had a sensitivity of 96%. Similar observations have been reported by Couture et al, Kline et al, Ljung et al, Koltz et al and Brenner et al .…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 98%

A Correlative Study Between Transrectal Fnac And Histology Of The Prostate For The Detection Of Prostate Carcinoma.

Pantola¹

2012

IOSR-JDMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy vs. Ultrasound-Guided Transrectal Random Core Biopsy of the Prostate

Cited by 9 publications

References 24 publications

Accuracy of Perineal Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Prostate under Ultra- Sound in Comparism with Transrectal Aspiration in Diagnosis of Prostatic Cancer

Accuracy of Perineal Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Prostate under Ultra- Sound in Comparism with Transrectal Aspiration in Diagnosis of Prostatic Cancer

Evaluation of The Role of Transrectal Fine Needle Aspiration As A Diagnostic Modality in The Diseases of Prostate with Review of Literature

A Correlative Study Between Transrectal Fnac And Histology Of The Prostate For The Detection Of Prostate Carcinoma.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About