2014
DOI: 10.1080/1034912x.2014.878532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine Motor Control is Related to Cognitive Control in Adolescents with Down Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results found in the present study corroborate with previous research that points to the interaction between levels of cognitive development and motor performance in populations with Down syndrome in sequential motor tasks (Schurink et al 2012;Chen et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results found in the present study corroborate with previous research that points to the interaction between levels of cognitive development and motor performance in populations with Down syndrome in sequential motor tasks (Schurink et al 2012;Chen et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These concerns are raised by some studies (Schurink et al 2012;Chen et al 2014). Chen et al (2014) adopted designs that relate levels of cognitive development and motor performance in DS individuals and concluded a strong correlation between cognition and motor performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Denver II test, this area verifies skills that include manual coordination, stimulus organization, accomplishment of delicate features, handling of small objects, involving, mainly, the cognitive and visual-motor skills. Studies show that the fine motor coordination is often impaired in these individuals 6 , 22 , 29 . The study by Santos, et al 22 (2010) showed that the most impaired areas in the children with DS were language and fine motor co-ordination, thus supporting the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is striking due to global alterations in the development process, involving motor, language, cognitive, self-care and personal-social dimensions 11 , and it is associated with specific behavioral phenotypes 26 . The alterations found in different development areas are not always proportional, although each area influences and is influenced by one another 5 , 6 , 11 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 26 - 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%