2016
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine mapping of a salmonid E2 alphavirus neutralizing epitope

Abstract: In this study, we aimed to characterize the epitope recognized by the neutralizing 17H23 mAb directed against the E2 glycoprotein of most of salmonid alphavirus (SAV) subtypes and widely used in several laboratories to routinely diagnose SAV. We hypothesized that the 17H23 epitope was located in the major domain B, previously identified in the E2 of mammalian alphaviruses as the domain recognized by most of the E2 neutralizing mAbs. Indeed, the SAV E2 domain B counterpart is contained in the protein domain pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SAV-infected cells were visualized using an indirect immunofluorescence test according to the procedure by Falk et al. [18] , but with the use of monoclonal antibody 17H23 directed against the E2 glycoprotein of SAV [19] as the primary antibody and with biotin labelled goat anti-mouse Ig and FITC-labelled streptavidin as the secondary amplification step. Standard TCID 50 end-point titers were determined by microscopic examination and calculations according to Kärber [23] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAV-infected cells were visualized using an indirect immunofluorescence test according to the procedure by Falk et al. [18] , but with the use of monoclonal antibody 17H23 directed against the E2 glycoprotein of SAV [19] as the primary antibody and with biotin labelled goat anti-mouse Ig and FITC-labelled streptavidin as the secondary amplification step. Standard TCID 50 end-point titers were determined by microscopic examination and calculations according to Kärber [23] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were further fixed and washed using the Intracellular Fixation & Permeabilization Buffer Set (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Following the second wash, the cells were incubated with a monoclonal antibody against E2 (mouse anti-E2 17H23) (1:1000) [ 30 ] for 60 min at room temperature, washed twice with permeabilization buffer and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:400) (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA). Nuclear DNA was stained with Hoechst 33,342 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, a 96-well CHSE plate was inoculated with cell culture supernatants and incubated at 15°C for 10 days. After fixation in 80% acetone, 50 μl of diluted SAV-specific mouse monoclonal antibody 17H23 directed against the E2 glycoprotein (25) was added per well and incubated for 1 h, followed by subsequent incubation for 1 h with diluted secondary biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (DAKO) before the final incubation with streptavidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate (eBioscience). Stained cell cultures were examined on an inverted fluorescence microscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%