2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1207-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine mapping of a major QTL for flag leaf width in rice, qFLW4, which might be caused by alternative splicing of NAL1

Abstract: Leaf width is an important agricultural trait in rice. QTL mapping in a recombinant inbred line population derived from the cross between the javanica cultivar D50 (narrow-leaved) and the indica cultivar HB277 (wide-leaved) identified five QTLs controlling flag leaf width. Fine mapping of the major QTL qFLW4 narrowed its location to a 74.8 kb interval between the SSR loci RM17483 and RM17486, a region which also contains the gene NAL1 (Narrow leaf 1). There was no difference in the level of NAL1 expression bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these QTLs, 1 QTL on chromosome 8 controlling length, width, and flag leaf area was at the same location. Since then, QTL mapping for flag leaf traits has been extensively conducted in different types of genetic populations, such as near isogenic lines, backcross inbred lines, doubled haploids (DHs), and F 2 , with more than 100 QTLs identified (Dong et al, 2003;Kobayashi et al, 2003;Shen et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004;Yue et al, 2006;Cao et al, 2007;Tong et al, 2007;Farooq et al, 2010;Ding et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011;Sonah et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2012). For example, Kobayashi et al (2003) mapped QTLs for FLL, FLW, and FLA using the Milyang23/Akihikari RIL population over 5 seasons, and found a total of 9 genomic regions involved in leaf development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these QTLs, 1 QTL on chromosome 8 controlling length, width, and flag leaf area was at the same location. Since then, QTL mapping for flag leaf traits has been extensively conducted in different types of genetic populations, such as near isogenic lines, backcross inbred lines, doubled haploids (DHs), and F 2 , with more than 100 QTLs identified (Dong et al, 2003;Kobayashi et al, 2003;Shen et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004;Yue et al, 2006;Cao et al, 2007;Tong et al, 2007;Farooq et al, 2010;Ding et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011;Sonah et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2012). For example, Kobayashi et al (2003) mapped QTLs for FLL, FLW, and FLA using the Milyang23/Akihikari RIL population over 5 seasons, and found a total of 9 genomic regions involved in leaf development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it could not explain the results of Chen et al (2012), where the R-type allele increased WFL in mapping of QTL for WFL using hybrid populations originated from a cross between D50 (R-type allele) and HB277 (H-type allele). This discrepancy might be because of the presence of a large number of alternatively spliced forms of the H-type allele and a low level of the NAL1 protein (Chen et al 2012). However, further analyses are required to identify the exact reason for this discrepancy.…”
Section: Products Of the Malfunctional H 233 -Type Allele Still Regulmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This would also explain the increase in WFL when the Daringan allele (H-type allele) was introduced into IR64 (R-type allele) (Fujita et al 2013) and when the Nipponbare allele (H-type allele) was introduced into 93-11 (R-type allele) (Zhang et al 2014). However, it could not explain the results of Chen et al (2012), where the R-type allele increased WFL in mapping of QTL for WFL using hybrid populations originated from a cross between D50 (R-type allele) and HB277 (H-type allele). This discrepancy might be because of the presence of a large number of alternatively spliced forms of the H-type allele and a low level of the NAL1 protein (Chen et al 2012).…”
Section: Products Of the Malfunctional H 233 -Type Allele Still Regulmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations