2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.19.997213
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-mapping and QTL tissue-sharing information improve causal gene identification and transcriptome prediction performance

Abstract: The integration of transcriptomic studies and GWAS (genome-wide association studies) via imputed expression has seen extensive application in recent years, enabling the functional characterization and causal gene prioritization of GWAS loci. However, the techniques for imputing transcriptomic traits from DNA variation remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, associations found when linking eQTL studies to complex traits through methods like PrediXcan can lead to false positives due to linkage disequilibrium between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the end, we collected 266 trios. We applied the PRS-based imputation scheme to these trios where the predicted expression was obtained from elastic net and DAPG weighted elastic net models trained on GTEx V8 whole blood European samples Barbeira et al (2020a,b). In particular, we ran the imputation for each chromosome, And to examine the power of the imputation, within each chromosome, we downsampled the genes to a fraction of the original number and re-ran the imputation to see how the imputation quality depends on the downsampling fraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end, we collected 266 trios. We applied the PRS-based imputation scheme to these trios where the predicted expression was obtained from elastic net and DAPG weighted elastic net models trained on GTEx V8 whole blood European samples Barbeira et al (2020a,b). In particular, we ran the imputation for each chromosome, And to examine the power of the imputation, within each chromosome, we downsampled the genes to a fraction of the original number and re-ran the imputation to see how the imputation quality depends on the downsampling fraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression counts were transformed to trimmed mean of M-values (TMMs). Gene expression prediction models of GTEx v8 were obtained from elsewhere [1,7] (see data availability statement). Gene expression prediction models of BarcUVa-Seq were generated for the whole sample size and for subsets of the data according to the anatomic location where the biopsies were collected (ascending, transverse and descending colon).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression prediction models of BarcUVa-Seq were generated for the whole sample size and for subsets of the data according to the anatomic location where the biopsies were collected (ascending, transverse and descending colon). The elastic net-based models were generated following the Pre-dictDB pipeline, which was the one used for GTEx v8 data [7]. Following this pipeline, we considered significant gene models those with a predictive performance P < 0.05 and R2 > 0.1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%