2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02415-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine human genetic map based on UK10K data set

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the inferred population declines shown in Fig. 4A were more severe than those inferred from the real data because the simulated data were generated under the assumption of a neutrally evolved single population and a homogeneous recombination rate, whereas humans evolved with subpopulations and a heterogeneous recombination rate ( 28 , 29 ). FitCoal was not found to overestimate such severity (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the inferred population declines shown in Fig. 4A were more severe than those inferred from the real data because the simulated data were generated under the assumption of a neutrally evolved single population and a homogeneous recombination rate, whereas humans evolved with subpopulations and a heterogeneous recombination rate ( 28 , 29 ). FitCoal was not found to overestimate such severity (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Pyrho uses SNPs as intervals with a step size of one SNP. Furthermore, to evaluate the recombination rate with different window sizes and methods, we also estimated historical recombination rates using a 10 kb window and a 5 kb step size for FastEPRR [33]. Following the software authors' recommended parameters, windows were excluded if they overlapped with known sequencing gaps in the pig reference genome (Sus_scrofa11.1) or if the number of non-singleton polymorphic sites was less than 10.…”
Section: Population-based Recombination Rate Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%